2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that Loading of Cohesin Onto Chromosomes Involves Opening of Its SMC Hinge

Abstract: Cohesin is a multisubunit complex that mediates sister-chromatid cohesion. Its Smc1 and Smc3 subunits possess ABC-like ATPases at one end of 50 nm long coiled coils. At the other ends are pseudosymmetrical hinge domains that interact to create V-shaped Smc1/Smc3 heterodimers. N- and C-terminal domains within cohesin's kleisin subunit Scc1 bind to Smc3 and Smc1 ATPase heads respectively, thereby creating a huge tripartite ring. It has been suggested that cohesin associates with chromosomes by trapping DNA withi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
284
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
284
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our mutagenesis strategy was based on the premise that the mutations would be expected to have the same effect in SMC2 as they do in bacterial SMC proteins (Hirano et al, 2001;Hirano and Hirano, 2006), cohesin SMCs (Arumugam et al, 2003;Weitzer et al, 2003;Arumugam et al, 2006) ABC transporters and RAD 50 (Hopfner et al, 2000; also see Figure 1B). A Walker A box mutation, K38I, and the D1113A mutation in the Walker B motif are predicted to prevent ATP binding, whereas an E1114Q "transition state" mutation in the Walker B box would slow the rate of ATP hydrolysis that is thought to be required for head disengagement in SMC complexes (Hirano, 2006).…”
Section: Atp Binding and Hydrolysis Are Required For Smc2 Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our mutagenesis strategy was based on the premise that the mutations would be expected to have the same effect in SMC2 as they do in bacterial SMC proteins (Hirano et al, 2001;Hirano and Hirano, 2006), cohesin SMCs (Arumugam et al, 2003;Weitzer et al, 2003;Arumugam et al, 2006) ABC transporters and RAD 50 (Hopfner et al, 2000; also see Figure 1B). A Walker A box mutation, K38I, and the D1113A mutation in the Walker B motif are predicted to prevent ATP binding, whereas an E1114Q "transition state" mutation in the Walker B box would slow the rate of ATP hydrolysis that is thought to be required for head disengagement in SMC complexes (Hirano, 2006).…”
Section: Atp Binding and Hydrolysis Are Required For Smc2 Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S1086R mutation in the C-terminal signature motif is predicted to allow ATP binding but prevent ATP hydrolysis. These four residues are completely conserved among SMCs and ABC transporters and have been extensively characterized (Hirano et al, 2001;Arumugam et al, 2003Arumugam et al, , 2006Weitzer et al, 2003;Hirano and Hirano, 2006), but little is known of their role in the condensin complex in vivo. Mutation of the conserved Q-loop (Q147L) is predicted to block binding of the attacking nucleophile (water) and Mg 2ϩ ions involved in ATP hydrolysis (Hopfner et al, 2000).…”
Section: Atp Binding and Hydrolysis Are Required For Smc2 Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering this work, it is perhaps most important to bear in mind that our yeastbased mislocalization system represents a variation on a simple and expandable theme: protein heterodimerization is linked to a chemical stimulus, and a single well-characterized compound, such as rapamycin, may be used to regulate the activity of a wide variety of gene products. Related systems have been employed previously in metazoans and cell lines to regulate protein stability (Stankunas et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2007;Stankunas et al, 2007;Janse et al, 2004;Banaszynski et al, 2006a;Maynard-Smith et al, 2007) and in both metazoans and in yeast to regulate protein-protein interactions (Gruber et al, 2006;Karpova et al, 2005;Mallet et al, 2002;Welm et al, 2002;Pownall et al, 2003;Gallagher et al, 2007;Schwartz et al, 2007). We expect future modifications of this dimerization approach to advance not only this system (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Protein fusion and chemical crosslinking studies in budding yeast have proposed an alternative possibility for cohesin’s DNA entry [42]. Covalent fusions of Smc3-Scc1 or Smc1-Scc1 have only a minor impact on chromatin loading of cohesin or sister chromatid cohesion establishment.…”
Section: Topological Dna Binding By Cohesinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covalent fusions of Smc3-Scc1 or Smc1-Scc1 have only a minor impact on chromatin loading of cohesin or sister chromatid cohesion establishment. In contrast, hinge closing by insertion of rapamycin induced dimerization proteins, or replacing the hinge domains with unrelated dimerizing proteins, ablates the chromosomal functions of cohesin [42,43]. These findings suggest that the Smc1-Smc3 hinge interface operates as the DNA entry site.…”
Section: Topological Dna Binding By Cohesinmentioning
confidence: 99%