2012
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
73
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though there is an inherent limitation of this study, as the nasopharyngeal airway is a threedimensional structure and was evaluated two dimensionally on lateral cephalometric films, such films have been used extensively to study airway dimensions. 26,27 A high correlation between posterior airway size on cephalometric radiographs and pharyngeal volume measured on tomographic scans has been reported. 28 Furthermore, Miles et al 29 reported a high reliability of identification of the commonly used cephalometric landmarks and measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Even though there is an inherent limitation of this study, as the nasopharyngeal airway is a threedimensional structure and was evaluated two dimensionally on lateral cephalometric films, such films have been used extensively to study airway dimensions. 26,27 A high correlation between posterior airway size on cephalometric radiographs and pharyngeal volume measured on tomographic scans has been reported. 28 Furthermore, Miles et al 29 reported a high reliability of identification of the commonly used cephalometric landmarks and measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cone-beam computed tomography is a useful method for the simultaneous evaluation of both the soft and hard tissues but is often not suitable for retrospective samples because of the unnecessary dose of radiation. 16 An alternative method to capture this information involves the combined use of pretreatment head films to evaluate the hard tissues and 3D scanners to assess the soft tissues. The latter method has the advantages of being noninvasive, free of radiation, and able to be used on large numbers of healthy people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all radiation exposure guidelines recommending against routine radiographic exposure of any kind [8][9][10][11][12], some orthodontists are advocating routinely taking cone beam computer tomographs (CBCT) on all orthodontic patients, including children, only to convert them into two dimensional cephalometric radiographs to perform traditional measurements developed over half a century ago [13][14][15][16][17]. Systematic reviews have concluded that there is no high quality evidence to support the use of CBCT in orthodontics [18,19] and cephalometric radiographs have been shown not to contribute significantly to treatment planning decisions [20][21][22]. Despite the radiation we routinely expose our patients to, we frequently plan the position of the teeth based on an unrelated view of the dental arches orientated with the occlusal plane parallel to the floor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%