2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1066-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence supporting that human-subsidized free-ranging dogs are the main cause of animal losses in small-scale farms in Chile

Abstract: We surveyed professionals from the Chilean Ministry of Agriculture working with small-scale farmers to characterize the attacks of free-ranging dogs across Chile. Nationwide, in a single year, free-ranging dogs attacked 25% of the ca. 8500 farms included in the survey, killing or injuring about 10 000 small ruminants. These dogs were ranked as the main cause of animal losses for small-scale farmers, representing a threat to the livelihoods of this vulnerable group. Further, free-ranging dogs attacking small ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a relevant finding, given that most previous research on the topic has been conducted in developed countries characterized by adequate management of pets [ 16 ]. The lack of movement restriction of dogs is a generalized problem in Chile, which has been reported in urban areas as a public health problem [ 41 , 58 ] and in rural areas as a problem that affects wildlife conservation [ 24 ], livestock husbandry, and human security [ 33 , 59 ]. Furthermore, some of the dogs detected could be abandoned animals, a frequent phenomenon in rural areas of southern Chile [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a relevant finding, given that most previous research on the topic has been conducted in developed countries characterized by adequate management of pets [ 16 ]. The lack of movement restriction of dogs is a generalized problem in Chile, which has been reported in urban areas as a public health problem [ 41 , 58 ] and in rural areas as a problem that affects wildlife conservation [ 24 ], livestock husbandry, and human security [ 33 , 59 ]. Furthermore, some of the dogs detected could be abandoned animals, a frequent phenomenon in rural areas of southern Chile [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of prey brought home represents only part of their hunting activity [22], thus representing the minimum number of animals killed by month. Still, the impact that cats have on wildlife does not appear to strike the news or be a societal concern as much as dogs’ impact on animals and the economic losses associated with their attacks to farm animals in the country [52]. This could be the result of people perceiving bringing prey back home as “bringing a present” [53], and as a consequence of this, having a better bond with their pet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another facet of the problem is that stray dogs cause traffic accidents [6,24,26]. Moreover, free-ranging dogs can cause animal losses in smallscale farms [27]. From the perspective of public health [28], it is important to understand that dogs can be affected by over 100 zoonotic, bacterial [29], viral [30], and parasitic diseases [31][32][33] and may be carriers of diseases that include rabies [34][35][36][37], leptospirosis [38], hookworm disease, echinococcosis, leishmaniasis [39], ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis, brucellosis [40], dirofilariasis [41], Bartonella spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%