Background: Exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH) is diagnosed and its severity assessed by post-exercise tracheobronchoscopy, and enumeration of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid red blood cells (BALFRBC). Minimal information is available regarding the relationship of tracheobronchoscopy score to BALFRBC number.Objective: Evaluate the relationship between BALFRBC number and tracheobronchoscopy scores and determine their diagnostic sensitivities.Animals: Nine sedentary horses, 21 fit Thoroughbreds, 129 Barrel Racers.Methods: Normal BALFRBC number and the effect of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) on it were evaluated by performing 2 BALs 24 hours apart in sedentary horses.Tracheobronchoscopy followed by BAL was performed 247 times on 150 horses after treadmill, racetrack, or barrel racing exercise. Lastly, a BALFRBC diagnostic threshold number that optimized the geometric mean of the sensitivity and precision (F1-score) was determined using Bayesian analysis.Results: No increase in BALFRBC occurred after the second BAL (mean ± SD, 304 ± 173/μL). Tracheobronchoscopy scores ranged from 0 (n = 112) to 4 (n = 4) and BAL-FRBC ranged from 102 to 4605268/μL. Spearman correlation between tracheobronchoscopy score and BALFRBC was weak (P < .001; rs = 0.42) with large ranges of BALFRBC associated with each tracheobronchoscopy score. The highest F1-score occurred for a BALFRBC threshold number = 992/μL. Seventy-five tracheobronchoscopy scores equaled 0 although BALFRBC number was ≥992/μL. Sensitivity of tracheobronchoscopy for diagnosing EIPH was poor (0.59; 95% confidence intervals[CI], 0.49-0.68), compared to BALFRBC number ≥992/μL (0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96).Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BALFRBC, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid red blood cell number; EIPH, exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RBC, red blood cells; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TBE, tracheobronchoscopic examination.