2011
DOI: 10.1002/etc.502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence suggesting that di‐n‐butyl phthalate has antiandrogenic effects in fish

Abstract: Abstract-Phthalate ester plasticizers are anti-androgenic in mammals. High doses of certain phthalates consistently interfere with the normal development of male offspring exposed in utero, causing disrupted sperm production, abnormal development of the genitalia, and in some cases, infertility. In the environment, phthalates are considered ubiquitous, and are commonly measured in aquatic ecosystems at low ng to µg per litre concentrations. Given the similarity between mammalian and teleost endocrine systems, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss of testicular function is caused by various mechanisms such as antiandrogenic effects of phthalate esters in rats [10] and fish [11], disruption of microtubule dynamics by Sertoli cell toxicants [12][13][14][15][16], disruption of Ca 2+ homeostasis [17], disruption of the blood-testis barrier via the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway The affected genes were classified into 12 functional categories according to "Gene Ontology".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Loss of testicular function is caused by various mechanisms such as antiandrogenic effects of phthalate esters in rats [10] and fish [11], disruption of microtubule dynamics by Sertoli cell toxicants [12][13][14][15][16], disruption of Ca 2+ homeostasis [17], disruption of the blood-testis barrier via the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway The affected genes were classified into 12 functional categories according to "Gene Ontology".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study demonstrated the disruption of all stages of spermatogenesis predicted by histopathological alterations in 3-month-old transgenic rats. These disorders were marked in terms of seminiferous epithelial sloughing, vacuolization and degeneration in spermatocytes in addition to abnormal elongated spermatids and spermatozoa in the seminiferous lumen.cDNA microarray and realtime PCR analyses revealed that the expression levels of four genes (cnot7, fgf7, testin and ostf1) significantly increased (P<0.05) and that those of two genes (versican and mamdc1) decreased (P<0.05).Loss of testicular function is caused by various mechanisms such as antiandrogenic effects of phthalate esters in rats [10] and fish [11], disruption of microtubule dynamics by Sertoli cell toxicants [12][13][14][15][16], disruption of Ca 2+ homeostasis [17], disruption of the blood-testis barrier via the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway In the epididymides of the transgenic rat, degenerating round spermatids (B1) and many types of abnormal elongated spermatids (B2-4) were frequently observed. Abnormal spermatozoa showing a breakage of surface membranes (B5) and decline in the member of outer dense fiber were also observed (B-6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significantly reduced plasma T and E 2 levels in females in this study may have been partly due to the inhibition of cyp17 and cyp19a gene expressions in the ovary. However, there are many inconsistent associations between sex hormone levels and transcriptions of genes involved in steroidogenesis both in vitro and in vivo assays (Aoki et al, 2011;Borch et al, 2006;Lambrot et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2005). Therefore, it has been suggested that the production of sex hormones is a complex process with multiple sensitive control points, and the genes involved in steroidogenesis are not transcribed to the same degree and correlations between hormone production and mRNA expression are not always observed (Gracia et al, 2007).…”
Section: Gene Transcriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group was administered a corn-oil vehicle only (a dose of 1 mL/kg), while the other five experimental groups were administered intragastrically, daily using a dosage regimen of 1, 10, 50, 200, 400 mg DBP/kg/body mass (dissolved in corn oil), for a period of 30-days. In rats, the Non-Observable-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) of DBP by intra-gastric gavage was 50 mg/kg/day (Mylchreest et al, 2000;Zhang et al, 2004), while a dose of 0, 15, and 35 μg DBP/L (Aoki et al, 2011) and 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 or 10 ppm DBP (Lee and Veeramachaneni, 2005) has been used in fish and amphibians, respectively. Overall, the doses used in the present avian study was chosen in order to achieve a dose-response relationship to DBP exposure on reproductive effects using relatively low experimental doses (1, 10 and 50 mg/kg body mass/day) and to high doses (200 and 400 mg/kg body mass/day), in order to obtain a mechanistic overview.…”
Section: Animals Husbandry and Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%