2016
DOI: 10.1056/nejmp1601154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence, Policy, and E-Cigarettes — Will England Reframe the Debate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is significant debate around the individual and population implications of e-cigarette use [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] . Our study is not without limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant debate around the individual and population implications of e-cigarette use [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] . Our study is not without limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-cigarettes are devices that vaporise a chemical liquid mixture, in most cases including nicotine, which is inhaled by users. A few years after e-cigarette entrance in the market, its popularity and use substantially grew worldwide (Green et al, 2016). In 2014 prevalence of ever and current e-cigarette users was among US adults 12.6% and 3.7%, respectively (Schoenborn and Gindi, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific community has sparked a huge debate to understand whether e-cigarettes should be considered a disruptive technology that increase quitting smoking and provide a safe alternative to cigarettes, or a threat to tobacco control that will allow the tobacco industry to subvert policies, renormalize smoking, recruit new smokers, and promote smoking in young people (Green et al, 2016;Yeh et al, 2016). One Cochrane review suggested that there is evidence from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that e-cigarettes may help smokers to quit in the long term compared with placebo e-cigarettes, even though under the GRADE system the overall quality of the evidence was judged as 'low' or 'very low', because of imprecision due to the small number of trials (Hartmann-Boyce et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Einschätzung der Bedeutung des E-Zigaretten-Konsums variiert zwischen unterschiedlichen Ländern stark [20] …”
Section: Ad 5: Normalisierung Des Konventionellen Tabakrauchensunclassified