2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence on postoperative abdominal binding: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Background: Midline laparotomy is an unavoidable approach to many surgical procedures.Many surgeons prescript the use of postoperative abdominal binder during the first mobilization after surgery. The use and the cost effective of this device is still debated by many surgeons.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing patients who wore abdominal binder ("binder") and patient who did not wear any abdominal binder ("non-binder") up to Mar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the heterogeneity of the studies considered (the analysis, in fact, combined open, laparoscopic, abdominal and gynaecological surgery) in the Jiang et al 1 paper, the findings are similar to our previous metanalysis 4 based specifically on the use of AB after open abdominal surgery, performed in elective settings, with no gynaecological/obstetrics indications. In this sense, a possible bias of the Jiang et al 1 study could be due to the different elastic forces distribution along the abdominal wall when are performed median incision for abdominal surgery or transverse one during gynaecological or obstetrics procedures.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Despite the heterogeneity of the studies considered (the analysis, in fact, combined open, laparoscopic, abdominal and gynaecological surgery) in the Jiang et al 1 paper, the findings are similar to our previous metanalysis 4 based specifically on the use of AB after open abdominal surgery, performed in elective settings, with no gynaecological/obstetrics indications. In this sense, a possible bias of the Jiang et al 1 study could be due to the different elastic forces distribution along the abdominal wall when are performed median incision for abdominal surgery or transverse one during gynaecological or obstetrics procedures.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Komprimierende Maßnahmen haben sich v. a. nach Brusteingriffen, abdominellen Operationen und Varizenoperationen bewährt. Obwohl sich die Studienlage heterogen zeigt, wird von einer Schmerzreduktion, verbesserter Mobilität, erhöhter Patientenzufriedenheit und reduzierter psychologischer Belastung in Verbindung mit dem postoperativen Einsatz von Bandagen oder Binden ausgegangen [ 17 ]. Paasch et al.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…It also significantly improved physical activity on the 3 rd post-operative day. [4] What is noteworthy is that the intended benefits of using abdominal binders differ significantly from the proven benefits. About 83% of the French surgeons considered prevention of wound dehiscence and incisional hernias to be the main expected benefit of using abdominal binder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%