1998
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.3.9490939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of the subperiosteal origin of osteoid osteomas in tubular bones: analysis by CT and MR imaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 2, 3, 4) [2,3]. Usually, OO are classified by their location as subperiosteal, cortical, endosteal, and medullary [15,16]. Furthermore, tumors of the proximal femur may be classified also as intra-articular or extra-articular [17].…”
Section: Nidusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2, 3, 4) [2,3]. Usually, OO are classified by their location as subperiosteal, cortical, endosteal, and medullary [15,16]. Furthermore, tumors of the proximal femur may be classified also as intra-articular or extra-articular [17].…”
Section: Nidusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subperiosteal lesions are extremely rare in the hand, with only limited reported cases (Crosby and Murphy 1988;Kayser et al 1998;Shankman et al 1997). The typical radiographic appearance is that of a small, radiolucent lesion or nidus surrounded by an area of bone sclerosis (Fig.…”
Section: Osteoid Osteomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesions occurring in the subperiosteum are rarer than those seen in the more conventional cortical location. Subperiosteal lesions are extremely rare in the hands with only a few reported cases [27][28][29].…”
Section: Osteoid Osteomamentioning
confidence: 99%