2013
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of the return of past pollution in the ocean: A model study

Abstract: Chemical contamination by persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is one of the anthropogenic stressors for the deep sea. Here we use a coupled multi‐compartment chemistry‐transport model to simulate long‐term transports and fate of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT). We show that the pollution signal received by the surface waters through atmospheric deposition is propagating downward and that ocean currents can act as a secondary source of POPs. Besides considerable time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior work suggests that accumulation of persistent organic contaminants in the subsurface ocean may provide an ongoing source to the surface ocean and atmosphere after elimination of primary emissions sources (Hung et al, ; Stemmler & Lammel, ). These studies have proposed that the ocean could act as source rather than sink for some legacy POPs due to mixing, seasonal entrainment of the mixed layer, and diffusion of volatile chemicals back to the surface ocean, followed by evasion to the atmosphere (Lohmann et al, ; Nizzetto et al, ; Stemmler & Lammel, ). Such processes have been proposed as one explanation for slowing declines in atmospheric concentrations of PCBs and even increases at some Arctic monitoring stations (Gioia, Lohmann, et al, ; Hung et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work suggests that accumulation of persistent organic contaminants in the subsurface ocean may provide an ongoing source to the surface ocean and atmosphere after elimination of primary emissions sources (Hung et al, ; Stemmler & Lammel, ). These studies have proposed that the ocean could act as source rather than sink for some legacy POPs due to mixing, seasonal entrainment of the mixed layer, and diffusion of volatile chemicals back to the surface ocean, followed by evasion to the atmosphere (Lohmann et al, ; Nizzetto et al, ; Stemmler & Lammel, ). Such processes have been proposed as one explanation for slowing declines in atmospheric concentrations of PCBs and even increases at some Arctic monitoring stations (Gioia, Lohmann, et al, ; Hung et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have hardly been primarily emitted since several decades, but their concentrations may be sustained by secondary emissions from oceans and land surfaces (Lammel and Stemmler 2012 ), only slowly decreasing in the global oceans (Lohmann et al 2007 ). Their concentrations might even re-rise in the deep sea (Stemmler and Lammel 2013 ). Decreasing concentrations in surface waters may be in response to decreasing atmospheric levels as was observed and predicted for the insecticides hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) (Jantunen and Bidleman 1998 ; Stemmler and Lammel 2009 ), or reflecting vertical transports in the ocean (Lohmann et al 2007 ; Nizzetto et al 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important example is a substantial mismatch between different methods of calculating the mass of POP. This can lead to further errors in calculating interphase diffusive fluxes, which are important for studying the future distribution of POPs in a changing climate . For model developers who use fugacity as the state‐variable, checking that the difference between the mass calculated using the mass balance equations, and the mass calculated using M = fZV provides an extremely useful consistency check for their code.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%