2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.826116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Related Coronaviruses Circulating in Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) Confiscated From the Illegal Wildlife Trade in Viet Nam

Abstract: Despite the discovery of several closely related viruses in bats, the direct evolutionary progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been identified. In this study, we investigated potential animal sources of SARS-related coronaviruses using archived specimens from Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) and Chinese pangolins (Manis pentadactyla) confiscated from the illegal wildlife trade, and from common palm civets (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus) raised on wildlife farms in Viet Nam. A total of 696 pangolin and civet speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pangolin susceptibility to coronaviruses has been demonstrated many times, the positivity rates vary among populations, ranging from 25% to 81% in different batches of dead pangolins (e.g., 17/21 ( Xiao et al, 2020 ), 5/18 ( Lam et al, 2020 ), 3/12 ( Lam et al, 2020 ), and 7/15 ( Nga et al, 2022 )). Two large-scale surveys of pangolins found that only a few individuals tested positive for coronavirus among hundreds of pangolin samples (e.g., 1/161 ( Shi et al, 2022 ) and 4/163 ( Peng et al, 2021 )).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although pangolin susceptibility to coronaviruses has been demonstrated many times, the positivity rates vary among populations, ranging from 25% to 81% in different batches of dead pangolins (e.g., 17/21 ( Xiao et al, 2020 ), 5/18 ( Lam et al, 2020 ), 3/12 ( Lam et al, 2020 ), and 7/15 ( Nga et al, 2022 )). Two large-scale surveys of pangolins found that only a few individuals tested positive for coronavirus among hundreds of pangolin samples (e.g., 1/161 ( Shi et al, 2022 ) and 4/163 ( Peng et al, 2021 )).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these broadly reactive consensus PCR tests, 539 bat samples collected in the guano farms and the bat cave were additionally screened specifically for Sarbecoviruses and SARS-CoV-2 using a RT-PCR assay targeting the E gene and RdRp gene [ 42 ] and cDNA previously obtained for the consensus PCR assays ( Table S1 ). Samples with positive results for either the E gene or RdRp gene assay were then screened using conventional PCR and primers specifically designed to detect pangolin Sarbecoviruses [ 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Includes 338 positive samples detected by the broadly reactive CoV consensus PCR [ 35 , 36 ] and one sample detected using the Sarbecovirus/SARS-CoV-2 assays [ 42 , 43 ]. b Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus was detected using the Sarbecovirus/SARS-CoV-2 assays [ 42 , 43 ] and was not detected by the broadly reactive CoV consensus PCR [ 35 , 36 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples have about 90% sequence homology with SARS-CoV-2. Recently, it was discovered that pangolins confiscated in Vietnam around 2017–2018 were also infected with a COVID-19-related virus [ 13 ]. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the CoV is most closely related to the pangolin samples from Guangxi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%