2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01644.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of restoration cost in the annual gynodioecious Phacelia dubia

Abstract: A negative pleiotropic effect on fitness of nuclear sex‐determining genes (cost of restoration) could explain nuclear–cytoplasmic gynodioecy but rarely has been demonstrated empirically. In a gynodioecious Phacelia dubia population, maternal lineages produce only hermaphroditic progenies irrespective of the pollen parent (N) or can segregate females (S). Natural progenies of N maternal plants had lower seed viability than that of S. Full‐sib progenies of unrelated hermaphrodites from all possible matings betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical investigations of this parameter remain extremely scarce but both costs on seed production— Plantago lanceolata (de Haan et al. ), Phacelia dubia (Del Castillo and Trujillo ); and on pollen production— Loebelia siphilitica (Bailey ), Beta vulgaris ssp . maritima (Dufay et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical investigations of this parameter remain extremely scarce but both costs on seed production— Plantago lanceolata (de Haan et al. ), Phacelia dubia (Del Castillo and Trujillo ); and on pollen production— Loebelia siphilitica (Bailey ), Beta vulgaris ssp . maritima (Dufay et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, these restorers are expected to co-occur with the CMS they restore, because they are counter-selected when the CMS is absent. Such costs have found experimental support in some gynodioecious species (for example Bailey, 2002;Dufay et al, 2008;Del Castillo and Trujillo, 2009), but spatial match between CMS and associated restorers is still debated. Better restoration is found in within-compared with between-population crosses in Thymus vulgaris (Belhassen et al, 1991;Gigord et al, 1998) but not Silene vulgaris (Emery and McCauley, 2002;Bailey and McCauley, 2005), and the level of restoration does not decrease with geographic distance in between-population crosses (Gigord et al, 1998;Bailey and McCauley, 2005).…”
Section: Geographical Pattern In Cms Diversity and Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its key role in models of sex ratio evolution, there is empirical evidence for a cost of restoration in few gynodioecious species [Plantago lanceolata (de Haan et al, 1997a), Lobelia siphilitica (Bailey, 2002), Beta vulgaris (Dufäy et al, 2008), Phacelia dubia (del Castillo & Trujillo, 2009)]. Because CMS and Rf genes have not been identified in natural populations of any gynodioecious species (reviewed in Delph et al, 2007), these studies used complex crossing designs and ⁄ or molecular markers to infer CMS and Rf genotypes before estimating cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%