1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1062-9769(99)80002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of nonlinear speculative bubbles in pacific-rim stock markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, evidence for episodes of non-linear behavior in financial asset markets has continued to grow. Studies have reported non-linearity in the American market, as demonstrated by Hinich and Patterson (1985), Scheinkman and LeBaron (1989), Hsieh (1991), Brock et al (1992), Hsieh (1995), Kohers et al (1997), Patterson and Ashley (2000) and Skaradzinski (2003); in European markets, as shown in Panunzi and Ricci (1993), Brooks (1996), Abhyankar et al (1997), Afonso and Teixeira (1998), Brooks and Hinich (1998), Opong et al (1999), Brooks and Hinich (2001), Kosfeld andRobé (2001), Fernandez-Serrano andSosvilla-Rivero (2003) and Panagiotidis (2005); in Asian markets, as discovered by Antoniou et al (1997), Ahmed et al (1999), Ammermann (1999), Ammermann and Patterson (2003), and ; and finally, in Latin American markets, as revealed by the findings of Bonilla et al (2006) and Romero-Meza et al (2007).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, evidence for episodes of non-linear behavior in financial asset markets has continued to grow. Studies have reported non-linearity in the American market, as demonstrated by Hinich and Patterson (1985), Scheinkman and LeBaron (1989), Hsieh (1991), Brock et al (1992), Hsieh (1995), Kohers et al (1997), Patterson and Ashley (2000) and Skaradzinski (2003); in European markets, as shown in Panunzi and Ricci (1993), Brooks (1996), Abhyankar et al (1997), Afonso and Teixeira (1998), Brooks and Hinich (1998), Opong et al (1999), Brooks and Hinich (2001), Kosfeld andRobé (2001), Fernandez-Serrano andSosvilla-Rivero (2003) and Panagiotidis (2005); in Asian markets, as discovered by Antoniou et al (1997), Ahmed et al (1999), Ammermann (1999), Ammermann and Patterson (2003), and ; and finally, in Latin American markets, as revealed by the findings of Bonilla et al (2006) and Romero-Meza et al (2007).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…(1999), Brooks and Hinich (2001), Kosfeld and Robé (2001), Fernandez‐Serrano and Sosvilla‐Rivero (2003) and Panagiotidis (2005); in Asian markets, as discovered by Antoniou et al. (1997), Ahmed et al. (1999), Ammermann (1999), Ammermann and Patterson (2003), Lim and Hinich (2005) and Lim et al.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 93%
“…McQueen and Thorley (1994) rejected the no-bubble hypothesis based on duration dependence tests and found significant evidence of a negative hazard function in runs of positive abnormal returns for the equally-weighted portfolios of NYSE stocks. Ahmed, Rosser and Uppal (1999) found the evidence of nonlinear speculative bubbles in Pacific-Rim stock markets. They rejected the absence of trends which can be interpreted as speculative and they also rejected the absence of nonlinearities beyond ARCH effects in the residual series for all countries.…”
Section: Presence Of Rational Speculative Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Taylor and David (1998) proposed a bubble test based on non-cointegration test. Ahmed et al (1999) use a vector autoregression model to examine nonlinearities in stock market movement in 10 Pacific Rim countries and districts, although they do not offer certainty that the estimated fundamentals are correct. After learning from the existing test failure, Wu (1997) proposes that if a bubble can be treated as an unobserved state vector in the state-space model, the Kalman filter technique should easily detect market bubbles.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%