2017
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/95/3/032037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Multi-Component Ion Exchange in Dolomite Formation during Low Salinity Waterflooding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, generally, dolomite is negatively charged; however, its interactions with the reservoir brine result in an oil wetting-causing mechanism owing to mineral dissolution, adsorption, and compression of the double layer. But interestingly, Srisuriyachai and Meekangwal report that the presence of divalent cations leads to the formation of calcium and magnesium carboxylate complexes, which improve oil recovery. This can be attributed to the consumption of the cations by the carboxylate groups, thus keeping the reservoir predominantly water wet and preventing cation bridging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, generally, dolomite is negatively charged; however, its interactions with the reservoir brine result in an oil wetting-causing mechanism owing to mineral dissolution, adsorption, and compression of the double layer. But interestingly, Srisuriyachai and Meekangwal report that the presence of divalent cations leads to the formation of calcium and magnesium carboxylate complexes, which improve oil recovery. This can be attributed to the consumption of the cations by the carboxylate groups, thus keeping the reservoir predominantly water wet and preventing cation bridging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a result of the increased ionic strength of brine in the presence of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ions because of their di-valency. It is also believed that the affinity of calcium and magnesium ions to the negatively charged surfaces is higher than that of Na + due to their smaller sizes in comparison to Na + [57]. Moreover, they result in a higher potential drop due to their smaller sizes leading to the higher ability to screen surface charge [29].…”
Section: Discussion Of Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of the literature shows that based on the type of crude oil and the properties of the reservoir and injection/formation brines, several mechanisms are proposed to explain the performance of LSW flooding. Multicomponent ionic exchange (MIE) [3][4][5], reduction in interfacial tension [6,7], expansion of the electric double layer [8][9][10][11][12], and rock dissolution [13][14][15][16][17], micro-dispersion formation [18,19] are the main mechanisms suggested by researchers to explain the incremental oil recovery by LSW in carbonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%