2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.61.054603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence ofΞhypernuclear production in the12C(K

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
84
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
14
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…potentials are much less attractive than the nucleonic ones, reflecting the weaker strength of the NY compared to the NN potentials. Within the ESC08 model, the well-depths U (k = 0) in normal nuclear matter of the , , and hyperons are, respectively, −39, +16, −8 MeV, and thus in reasonable agreement with current experimental estimates of these quantities [20,21]. The partial wave decompositions of these values are given in Table III which also lists explicitly the contributions of the different (isospin) channels according to Eqs.…”
Section: A Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…potentials are much less attractive than the nucleonic ones, reflecting the weaker strength of the NY compared to the NN potentials. Within the ESC08 model, the well-depths U (k = 0) in normal nuclear matter of the , , and hyperons are, respectively, −39, +16, −8 MeV, and thus in reasonable agreement with current experimental estimates of these quantities [20,21]. The partial wave decompositions of these values are given in Table III which also lists explicitly the contributions of the different (isospin) channels according to Eqs.…”
Section: A Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This result agrees with theoretical predictions for in nuclear matter obtained in the model D of the Nijmegen group [44]. However, the missing-mass spectra of a double-charge exchange reaction on a target have suggested the well depth of 14-16 MeV ( MeV MeV) [45], [46]. Data related to the -nucleon interaction are controversial.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The analyses of the (π − , K + ) reaction data on medium to heavy nuclei (Noumi et al 2002) performed in Harada & Hirabayashi (2006) and Kohno et al (2006) revealed a moderately repulsive Σ-nuclear potential in the nuclear interior of around 10-40 MeV, while the fits to Σ − atomic data (Friedman & Gal 2007) indicate a clear transition from an attractive Σ potential in the surface, to a repulsive one in the interior, although the size of the repulsion cannot be precisely determined. As for the strangeness −2 systems, the Nagara event (Takahashi et al 2001) and other experiments providing consistency checks established the size of the ΛΛ interaction to be mildly attractive, (Dover & Gal 1983), while the missing-mass spectra of the -+ K K , ( ) reaction on a 12 C target suggest a milder attraction of −20 MeV (Fukuda et al 1998) or ∼−14±2 MeV (Khaustov et al 2000). These values are compatible with the recent analysis of the nuclear emulsion event KISO, claiming to have observed a nuclear bound state of the Ξ − -14 N system with a binding energy of 4.38±0.25 MeV (Nakazawa et al 2015).…”
Section: Hyperons and Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 90%