1999
DOI: 10.1006/clim.1998.4626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Indirect Allorecognition in Long-Term Human Renal Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, MHC‐allopeptides have been used to induce tolerance in experimental transplantation models, suggesting that the indirect pathway of allorecognition also participates in the induction of tolerance [12, 13]. In addition, we and others have observed donor indirect allorecognition in renal transplant patients, irrespective of rejection [14–16]. We also observed predominant interleukin (IL)‐10 production induced by indirect alloreactivity to donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐DR mismatched peptides, in renal transplant patients without rejection [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…On the other hand, MHC‐allopeptides have been used to induce tolerance in experimental transplantation models, suggesting that the indirect pathway of allorecognition also participates in the induction of tolerance [12, 13]. In addition, we and others have observed donor indirect allorecognition in renal transplant patients, irrespective of rejection [14–16]. We also observed predominant interleukin (IL)‐10 production induced by indirect alloreactivity to donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐DR mismatched peptides, in renal transplant patients without rejection [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Because indirect priming is dependent on antigen presentation by a recipient HLA molecule and can theoretically occur any time after the transplant, it has been postulated that CD4 ϩ T cells responding through the indirect pathway actually play a dominant role in the development of CAN (20). Indeed, results from several laboratories have provided strong correlative evidence that indirectly primed CD4 ϩ T cells are associated with clinical/pathologic evidence of chronic allograft injury (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Alloreactive T cells also directly recognize allo-MHC molecules on the surface of donor antigen presenting cells (APC).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, depletion of allogeneic APCs will prevent the response of recipient CD4 + T cells toward foreign HLA class II molecules, referred to as the direct way of allorecognition. As shown in Table 2A, the stimulation of recipient CD4 + T cells with APC‐depleted allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) correlated with acute rejection in two studies (44, 45), whereas other studies found no correlation between indirect allorecognition and acute allograft rejection (39, 41, 46). However, it cannot be ruled out that direct allorecognition still interferes in the immune reaction as small numbers of residual donor APCs may remain present.…”
Section: Allogeneic Cells Depleted Of Apcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As chronic allograft rejection is thought to be mediated mainly by recipient T cells with indirect allospecificity, most in vitro assays aiming to detect indirect allorecognition have been performed after solid organ transplantation. As depicted in Table 2, recipient T‐cell reactivity to donor‐like or donor‐derived antigens was associated with acute as well as chronic rejection in numerous studies, except for some (38–43). However, in the following sections, it will become evident that test conditions vary considerably among studies, while often essential controls are lacking.…”
Section: In Vitro Assays To Monitor Indirect Allorecognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%