2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2625792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Increasing Differential Mortality: A Comparison of the HRS and SIPP

Abstract: is to produce first-class research and forge a strong link between the academic community and decision-makers in the public and private sectors around an issue of critical importance to the nation's future. To achieve this mission, the Center sponsors a wide variety of research projects, transmits new findings to a broad audience, trains new scholars, and broadens access to valuable data sources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasting rich versus poor cohorts reveals that, as expected, wealth (panel a), and health (panel c) depletion is faster for poor agents, such that low-wealth individuals enter 24 the depletion, and accelerating regions more rapidly (panel d). Moreover, exposure to death risk is higher for the poor (panel e), consistent with stylized facts (Bosworth et al, 2016;Bosworth and Zhang, 2015), except at very old age where attrition effects imply that only the very healthy poor agents remain alive, and the rich and poor exposures to mortality are converging. Put differently, our simulations indicate that agents entering the last period of life optimally select a short expected lifespan, and allocations that are consistent with optimal closing down, i.e.…”
Section: Simulation Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrasting rich versus poor cohorts reveals that, as expected, wealth (panel a), and health (panel c) depletion is faster for poor agents, such that low-wealth individuals enter 24 the depletion, and accelerating regions more rapidly (panel d). Moreover, exposure to death risk is higher for the poor (panel e), consistent with stylized facts (Bosworth et al, 2016;Bosworth and Zhang, 2015), except at very old age where attrition effects imply that only the very healthy poor agents remain alive, and the rich and poor exposures to mortality are converging. Put differently, our simulations indicate that agents entering the last period of life optimally select a short expected lifespan, and allocations that are consistent with optimal closing down, i.e.…”
Section: Simulation Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It follows that unless very wealthy, and very unhealthy, the bulk of the population would be located in the health and wealth depletion regions. Besides being consistent with expectations regarding agents near the end of life, the results also rationalize better longevity for the rich (Bosworth et 22 al., 2016;Bosworth and Zhang, 2015). Indeed, very rich and sick agents who are not in in the health depletion region will select expected increase in the health capital as long as their wealth maintains them out of the D H region.…”
Section: Induced Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third type of policy option attempts to mitigate changes in differential mortality by SES. This option builds on the idea that solely adjusting benefits to average life expectancy would not account for the fact that persons with high SES have exhibited the largest longevity gains (Bosworth & Zhang, 2015). As noted, greater life expectancy associates with characteristics of higher SES, and research shows that SES differentials in life expectancy of retirees have been increasing since World War II.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, declining old-age mortality in the United States has not been uniform. Growing evidence suggests that mortality risks by SES have been widening over time, measured by income, education, and occupation (Bosworth & Burke, 2014 ; Bosworth & Zhang, 2015; Bound, Geronimus, Rodriguez, & Waidmann, 2014; Cristia, 2009; Goldman & Orszag, 2014; Masters, Hummer, & Powers, 2012; Montez, Hummer, Hayward, Woo, & Rogers, 2011; Olshansky et al, 2012; Preston, Stokes, Mehta, & Cao, 2014; Waldron, 2007, 2013). This leads to the policy concern that changing differentials in old-age mortality are making the Social Security system increasingly less generous to low-income individuals on a lifetime basis (Goldman & Orszag, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, official demographic projections usually do not provide any disaggregation by socioeconomic sub-groups, and this aspect represents a major drawback in the context of ageing and retirement planning for two main reasons. First, health status and life expectancy have a strong socioeconomic gradient (Dowd et al, 2011;Mackenbach & Valverde, 2018;Majer, Nusselder, Mackenbach, & Kunst, 2011;Office for National Statistics, 2012;Stringhini et al, 2017), even in old age (Enroth, Raitanen, Hervonen, & Jylhä, 2013;Hoffmann, 2008Hoffmann, , 2011Zarulli, Domantas, & Jdanov, 2012), the future evolution of which is highly debated (Bosworth & Zhang, 2015;Currie & Schwandt, 2016). The transparency and soundness of the hypotheses that support any population projection would increase considerably if they were disaggregated by socioeconomic sub-groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%