2018
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of X-rays in the oral mucosa epithelium of adults subjected to cone beam CT

Abstract: The partial and total CBCT seems to offer risks of inducing genetic damage. In addition both forms of CBCT acquisition have promoted the induction of cytotoxic nuclear alterations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(74 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the cytotoxic effect was examined through the incidences of condensed chromatin, karyorrhexis, pyknosis, and karyolysis. CBCT stimulated cellular death, as shown by the significant changes between values before and 10 ± 2 days after the exposure ( p < 0.05), in agreement with the results of other studies [ 29 , 42 44 ]. These findings reinforce the idea that CBCT might promote cytotoxicity in the buccal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the cytotoxic effect was examined through the incidences of condensed chromatin, karyorrhexis, pyknosis, and karyolysis. CBCT stimulated cellular death, as shown by the significant changes between values before and 10 ± 2 days after the exposure ( p < 0.05), in agreement with the results of other studies [ 29 , 42 44 ]. These findings reinforce the idea that CBCT might promote cytotoxicity in the buccal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…After the CBCT scan by 10 ± 2 days, the mean percentages of micronuclei were significantly increased, indicating that CBCT can induce a genotoxic effect on the buccal mucosa of children. This finding is in line with the results from the study of Fonte et al, which was performed on adults to investigate the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of CBCT in oral exfoliated cells and confirmed that CBCT offers the risk of inducing genetic damage [ 42 ]. These results contrast with the findings of another study performed on children to compare mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in exfoliated buccal cells after CBCT exposure and reported that micronuclei were not significantly increased 10 ± 2 days after the exposure [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results show that SECT or DECT elicit a similar amount of dsDNA damage, suggesting a comparable biological effect for this endpoint. Future studies of other endpoints like e.g., chromosome aberrations or micronuclei 33 shall provide further insights into the radio-response of PBMCs to SECT or DECT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,64,[80][81][82] However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a protocol is proposed to detect DNA DSBs after CBCT examination, although other genotoxicity markers have been published before. 83 Our validation data show that that ex vivo BM cells can be used to perform γH2AX/53BP1 analysis. Future studies will investigate whether age-dependent differences can be detected in the amount of DNA DSBs after CBCT examination.…”
Section: Methods For Assessing Cellular and Subcellular Changes After Cbctmentioning
confidence: 76%