1992
DOI: 10.1038/ng0792-257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of founder chromosomes in fragile X syndrome

Abstract: The mutation responsible for fragile X syndrome and myotonic dystrophy involves the amplification of a simple trinucleotide repeat sequence, which increases in successive generations of affected pedigrees accounting for increasing penetrance of both disorders. This common molecular basis suggests that the two diseases may share other genetic features, but whereas myotonic dystrophy exhibits a significant founder chromosome effect, fragile X syndrome apparently has a very high mutation frequency. By haplotype a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This finding suggests that different rates of normal-to-premutation, as proposed under the founder-haplotype hypothesis (Richards et al, 1992;Chakravarti, 1992;Jacobs et al, 1993), could be sufficient to yield substantial variation in carrier frequencies. This founder-haplotype hypothesis is also consistent with earlier reports that Asian and non-Asian populations may differ in their distributions of FMR1 alleles with various numbers and positions of AGG repeats within the CGGrepeat region (see, for example Hirst et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…2). This finding suggests that different rates of normal-to-premutation, as proposed under the founder-haplotype hypothesis (Richards et al, 1992;Chakravarti, 1992;Jacobs et al, 1993), could be sufficient to yield substantial variation in carrier frequencies. This founder-haplotype hypothesis is also consistent with earlier reports that Asian and non-Asian populations may differ in their distributions of FMR1 alleles with various numbers and positions of AGG repeats within the CGGrepeat region (see, for example Hirst et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…On the one hand, although instability-predisposing haplotypes have been demonstrated in other trinucleotide repeat-related human disorders, with specific haplotypes in linkage disequilibrium with repeat copy numbers at the high end of the normal range and with the expanded alleles, 18,23,28,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] this does not seem to be the case in MJD, at least not in all populations. On the other hand, if there was a instability-predisposing haplotype, its effect should also be detectable on intergenerational instability of the expansion-carrying chromosomes, therefore there should be a noticeable effect of the haplotype on instability in cis, which we do not detect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), only the hexa-His and hexa-Asn tracts are encoded by a triplet repeat reminiscent of the genetic expansion of poly-Gln repeats associated with several neurodegenerative disorders (Richards et al, 1992). The functional significance, if any, of these repeats is unclear but none of them are conserved in LjNIN or the other NLPs.…”
Section: Domains Of the Psnin Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%