2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-020-02022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of climate-induced stress of Norway spruce along elevation gradient preceding the current dieback in Central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
49
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
49
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our approach makes it more difficult to project current dynamics into the climate change scenarios. Nevertheless, present studies did not reveal significant changes in the growth rate of spruce along altitude gradients in the European Alps, indicating no climate change effects so far [45].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Growth Rate Modelscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, our approach makes it more difficult to project current dynamics into the climate change scenarios. Nevertheless, present studies did not reveal significant changes in the growth rate of spruce along altitude gradients in the European Alps, indicating no climate change effects so far [45].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Growth Rate Modelscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…This is in line with earlier findings which show that the isohydric Norway spruce species has tighter stomatal control in response to increasing VPD than the anisohydric European beech species, which can tolerate drought stress better [29,[58][59][60]. Therefore, as more frequent heatwaves and drought spells characterize the proceeding climate change, an unavoidable shift of the Central Europe silviculture strategy is expected, providing likely higher opportunity for growing European beech while a higher risk for the coniferous Norway spruce [61,62]. Additionally, GPP norm reduction within the beech forest site was presumably mainly induced by edaphic drought stress (low soil moisture) conditions, further stressing the significant impact of SVWC on forest GPP, especially at the beech forest stand due to its different soil properties (more clayey soil) from the other forest sites [23,[63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Comparisons between the two methods have shown that both techniques may differ in the calculation of such dates by one-two weeks (Mäkinen et al 2008;Cruz-García et al 2019). Dendrometers, however, are not as cost and labor-intensive and thus a larger number of trees can be monitored over a longer-time period (Vospernik and Nothdurft 2018;Krejza et al 2020;Szymczak 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In temperate forests the onset of tree growth is triggered by increasing temperatures in spring, when day length increases (Körner and Basler 2010). Tree growth in conifers and broadleaf trees is reported to start when air temperature rises above 5 °C (Begum et al 2007;Rossi et al 2007) and maximum growth for many species is synchronously observed in June shortly before the summer solstice (Rossi et al 2007;Krejza et al 2020;Pukienė et al 2020). For many species the period of rapid growth is quite short.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%