2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01874.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of a latitudinal gradient in spider diversity in Australian cotton

Abstract: The most common explanation for species diversity increasing towards the tropics is the corresponding increase in habitats (spatial heterogeneity). Consequently, a monoculture (like cotton in Australia) which is grown along a latitudinal gradient, should have the same degree of species diversity throughout its range. We tested to see if diversity in a dominant cotton community (spiders) changed with latitude, and if the community was structurally identical in different parts of Australia.We sampled seven sites… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At smaller (i.e., local and landscape) spatial scales, spiders have been shown to respond strongly to habitat (Koponen, 1987;Rypstra et al, 1999;Muff et al, 2009), whereas at broad spatial scales spiders seem to follow spatial predictors (e.g., latitude) quite well (Finch et al, 2008;Whitehouse et al, 2009). However, at a regional scale, habitat complexity has been shown to be more important than spatial predictors (e.g., elevation) in determining spider FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At smaller (i.e., local and landscape) spatial scales, spiders have been shown to respond strongly to habitat (Koponen, 1987;Rypstra et al, 1999;Muff et al, 2009), whereas at broad spatial scales spiders seem to follow spatial predictors (e.g., latitude) quite well (Finch et al, 2008;Whitehouse et al, 2009). However, at a regional scale, habitat complexity has been shown to be more important than spatial predictors (e.g., elevation) in determining spider FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitfall trapping is useful for studying arthropod biodiversity at large spatial scales (e.g., Gotelli and Ellison, 2002;Chatzaki et al, 2005;Whitehouse et al, 2009) and allows for consistent and repeatable sampling. Each pitfall trap consisted of a transparent plastic container (6 cm in diameter, 7 cm deep) half filled with 1:1 water and propylene glycol.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of individuals of each taxon per m 2 per site was summed across the samples collected in each region (NSW 756,Queensland 231 and WA 450). For these taxa, we selected a number of families for inclusion in the literature search based on their likely impact on pest species as described in previous studies (Waterhouse & Sands 2001;Pearce et al 2004;Furlong et al 2004b;Tsitsilas et al 2006;Holloway et al 2008;Whitehouse et al 2009;Tsitsilas et al 2011). The sampling techniques used in this study (beating the vegetation and vacuum samples) were useful for the day-active natural enemies on plants but may have missed ground-active and nocturnal species.…”
Section: Priority Taxa Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One means of controlling mirids in cotton without resorting to sprays is to enhance key mirid predators. Two animals in the predator guild which are common in cotton are the damsel bug, Nabis kinbergii Reuter, and the lynx spider, Oxyopes molarius L. Koch (Whitehouse & Grimshaw 2007;Whitehouse et al 2009). Studies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays techniques indicate that both of these predators attack mirids in the field (M.E.A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%