1995
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00524-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of a complete independence of the neurobiological substrates for the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
156
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
156
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AMPH appears to produce these long-lasting effects by acting in the VTA. Infusions of the drug into this site have been shown to produce locomotor sensitization to AMPH (Perugini and Vezina, 1994;Cador et al, 1995) and cocaine (Kalivas and Weber, 1988), NAcc DA sensitization to AMPH (Vezina, 1993(Vezina, , 1996, as well as enhanced AMPH and cocaine ; present study) self-administration. Conversely, sensitized locomotor responding to AMPH and cocaine (Kalivas and Weber, Figure 3.…”
Section: Amph Acts In the Vta To Induce Psychostimulant Sensitizationsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMPH appears to produce these long-lasting effects by acting in the VTA. Infusions of the drug into this site have been shown to produce locomotor sensitization to AMPH (Perugini and Vezina, 1994;Cador et al, 1995) and cocaine (Kalivas and Weber, 1988), NAcc DA sensitization to AMPH (Vezina, 1993(Vezina, , 1996, as well as enhanced AMPH and cocaine ; present study) self-administration. Conversely, sensitized locomotor responding to AMPH and cocaine (Kalivas and Weber, Figure 3.…”
Section: Amph Acts In the Vta To Induce Psychostimulant Sensitizationsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Exposure to AMPH enhances cocaine self-administration N Suto et al 1988; Hooks et al, 1992;Cador et al, 1995) and enhanced AMPH self-administration are not produced when animals are pre-exposed to AMPH in DA neuron terminal regions such as the NAcc. Overall, this evidence indicates that AMPH acts in the VTA not only to produce sensitized locomotor and NAcc DA responding to psychostimulants but also to enhance the self-administration of these drugs.…”
Section: Neuropsychopharmacologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot rule out that the intact brain is required for potentiation. However, previous work demonstrated that local injection of amphetamine into the VTA in vivo is sufficient to trigger sensitization (Vezina, 1993;Cador et al, 1995). We therefore speculate that amphetamine can directly trigger LTP within the VTA in vivo because sufficient levels of glutamatergic synaptic activity are present, but that in our slice experiments levels of synaptic activity are too low to trigger LTP.…”
Section: In Vitro Exposure To Amphetamine Does Not Trigger Ltpmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Thus, considerable effort has been directed at studying the mechanisms responsible for behavioral sensitization. Local effects of drugs of abuse on VTA neurons appear to be necessary and sufficient to trigger sensitization, because repeated local microinjections of amphetamine or morphine into the VTA elicit behavioral sensitization (Kalivas and Duffy, 1987;Kalivas and Weber, 1988;Druhan et al, 1993;Vezina, 1993;Cador et al, 1995) and microinjections of specific DA or glutamate receptor antagonists into the VTA prevent sensitization (Vezina and Stewart, 1989;Kalivas and Alesdatter, 1993;Bjijou et al, 1996;Kim and Vezina, 1998;Cador et al, 1999;Vezina and Queen, 2000). Several lines of evidence support the idea that synaptic plasticity at glutamate synapses in the VTA plays a key role in triggering sensitization and other neuroadaptations that may contribute to the development of addiction (Schenk and Snow, 1994;White, 1996;Carlezon et al, 1997;Ungless et al, 2001;Hyman and Malenka, 2001;Kauer, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the differential response to amphetamine does not result from alterations in basal activity levels. As the acute effects of amphetamine on locomotor activity are largely mediated by amphetamine-induced DA release in the Nacc, [22][23][24] it is possible to speculate that the blunted response to amphetamine observed in dcc heterozygotes results from decreased mesoaccumbens DA transmission. Several lines of evidence indicate that DA neurons that project to the NAcc (mesolimbic) have anatomical and functional characteristics that are distinct from those that project to the mPFC (mesocortical).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%