2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence in favor of visual representation for the dataflow paradigm: An experiment testing LabVIEW's comprehensibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were three errors (two involving pruning and one involving collapsing), although students were not told that. Whitley, Novick, and Fisher () found that asking students to identify errors is a good way to measure their understanding of a concept.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were three errors (two involving pruning and one involving collapsing), although students were not told that. Whitley, Novick, and Fisher () found that asking students to identify errors is a good way to measure their understanding of a concept.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We kept the identifying errors question separate from the other ToL subsets questions because it required a deeper level of cognitive analysis: Students had to figure out what would be the correct answer after both pruning and collapsing taxa on the same cladogram (a skill they had not practiced), compare the given answer to the one they generated, identify the discrepancies, and then explain how to fix the errors. Whitley et al () found in their instructional study concerning computer programming that this type of debugging question was a particularly good measure of student understanding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As end-users defining reactive behaviors in ambient intelligent environments with our rule model will have to effectively define these data transformation flows, it is important to evaluate the ease of understanding of the proposed visual dataflow language. However, unlike other studies that have done this on specific tools, using complex approximations including bifurcations and iterations, aimed at software engineering students with some experience in the subject [40], our study focused on basic structures suited to young non-programmers. The objective of the study was therefore to evaluate the ease of understanding, creation and evolution of expressions and ease of use of the system by this user segment.…”
Section: User Study On Dataflow Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the tutor's guidance, the student carried out the general design of the software according to the above functions, including making a choice of the software platform and designing the software architecture. It can be learned from literatures that there are two kinds of software development platforms for virtual instruments: (1) Textual programming language [5] : visual C++, Visual Basic, LabWindows CVI, and so on; (2) Graphical programming language [6] : LabVIEW, HPVEE, and so on. Among them, LabVIEW, which stands for Laboratory Virtual Instruments Engineering Workbench, is a Graphical Programming Language ¿rst released by National Instruments, with intelligible user interface construction [7] and dataflow programming concept [8] .…”
Section: A Starting Phase Period:cultivating Ability Of Analyzing Thmentioning
confidence: 99%