2021
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence gaps and research needs in current guidance on feeding children from birth to 24 months

Abstract: A U.S. National Academies report summarized recommendations on what and how to feed infants and young children in high-income countries from 43 eligible guideline documents. Consistency existed across many recommendations, but some differences occurred in topic areas, age groupings and methodological approaches. Future development of guidelines on feeding of infants and young children requires new research and a rigorous evidence-based review process that is harmonized within and across countries and incorpora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breastfeeding exclusivity ≥5 months was computed by collapsing responses from a PUMF exclusive breastfeeding variable, calculated from infant age (unavailable in PUMF dataset), breastfeeding initiation, and introduction of liquids or solids (ordinal response options increasing by 1 month, up to ≥6 months). Exclusive breastfeeding to ≥5 months is another cut-off to capture breastfeeding trends (World Health Organization n.d.), and may provide potential insights into responsive infant feeding given that caregivers may follow infant signs of readiness (e.g., sitting independently, ability to cue interest in food and satiety) rather than strict age guidelines to initiate complementary feeding (Atkinson et al 2021). Total breastfeeding duration (continuous data; months) in the PUMF was available among respondents who either were no longer breastfeeding at the time of the survey or never initiated; note that 21% of respondents (unweighted n = 1093) who were still breastfeeding at the time of the survey are excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breastfeeding exclusivity ≥5 months was computed by collapsing responses from a PUMF exclusive breastfeeding variable, calculated from infant age (unavailable in PUMF dataset), breastfeeding initiation, and introduction of liquids or solids (ordinal response options increasing by 1 month, up to ≥6 months). Exclusive breastfeeding to ≥5 months is another cut-off to capture breastfeeding trends (World Health Organization n.d.), and may provide potential insights into responsive infant feeding given that caregivers may follow infant signs of readiness (e.g., sitting independently, ability to cue interest in food and satiety) rather than strict age guidelines to initiate complementary feeding (Atkinson et al 2021). Total breastfeeding duration (continuous data; months) in the PUMF was available among respondents who either were no longer breastfeeding at the time of the survey or never initiated; note that 21% of respondents (unweighted n = 1093) who were still breastfeeding at the time of the survey are excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this commentary, we summarize the RF-related findings from a recent US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies) consensus study report examining consistency in infant and young child feeding (IYCF) recommendations in guidelines from high-income countries ( 12 ) and discuss implications for future IYCF guidelines. This commentary complements 2 previous ones detailing the implications of the consensus study to registered dietitian nutritionists ( 13 ) and researchers ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%