2014
DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke in Dialysis Patients

Abstract: The risks of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke are particularly high in dialysis patients of any age and outcomes are poor. It is therefore important to identify strategies that safely minimize stroke risk in this population. Observational studies have been unable to clarify the relative importance of traditional stroke risk factors such as blood pressure and cholesterol in those on dialysis, and are affected by biases that usually make them an inappropriate source of data on which to base therapeutic decis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Male sex, history of cardiovascular events, higher systolic blood pressure, and lower hemoglobin levels were associated with increased brain hemorrhage risk, consistent with previous reports. 3,[7][8][9][10] Similarly, the identified associations of older age and history of cardiovascular events with increased risk of brain infarction were consistent with previous observations. 3,[7][8][9] However, the mechanisms whereby lower serum PTH levels and higher normalized protein catabolic rate enhance the risk of brain infarction remain unclear.…”
Section: September 2016supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Male sex, history of cardiovascular events, higher systolic blood pressure, and lower hemoglobin levels were associated with increased brain hemorrhage risk, consistent with previous reports. 3,[7][8][9][10] Similarly, the identified associations of older age and history of cardiovascular events with increased risk of brain infarction were consistent with previous observations. 3,[7][8][9] However, the mechanisms whereby lower serum PTH levels and higher normalized protein catabolic rate enhance the risk of brain infarction remain unclear.…”
Section: September 2016supporting
confidence: 80%
“…[1][2][3][4] The risk of stroke is increased in patients with CKD, 3,4 and CKD patients, especially those undergoing hemodialysis, are at increased risks of hospitalization, disability, and death after stroke, which are associated with a negative impact on society. [5][6][7] Although previous studies have identified traditional and nontraditional risk factors for stroke in hemodialysis patients, the incidence of stroke still remains unacceptably high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This percentage is higher than the percentage of black individuals in the overall population, it is indeed proportional to their percentage of black patients among dialysis patients in the United States,13 (2) Dialysis patients experiencing AIS are more likely to be cared for at urban, teaching hospital and to be in the lowest quartile of median household income, (3) Although dialysis patients had higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary and vascular diseases, and heart failure, they had lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation, a major risk factor for AIS. This could be related to the lower incidence of atrial fibrillation among black and Hispanic patients, who together constituted 50% of the AIS dialysis population,20 and (4) Despite the higher prevalence of vascular disease and the higher perceived risk of bleeding among dialysis patients, the utilization of thrombolytic increased proportionally in dialysis and non‐dialysis patients. The utilization rates of mechanical thrombectomy were minuscule in both groups, because these data preceded the published trials demonstrating the significant benefit of thrombectomy in selected AIS patients 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of anti-thrombosis agents on the incidence of ischemic stroke in HD patients is controversial [22]. A notable difference between a study by Olesen et al [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%