2008
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2008.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the functional significance of diazotroph community structure in soil

Abstract: Microbial ecologists continue to seek a greater understanding of the factors that govern the ecological significance of microbial community structure. Changes in community structure have been shown to have functional significance for processes that are mediated by a narrow spectrum of organisms, such as nitrification and denitrification, but in some cases, functional redundancy in the community seems to buffer microbial ecosystem processes. The functional significance of microbial community structure is freque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
148
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
148
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the southern Qilian Mountains, the Shannon diversity index of the nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the shrubland soil was lower than that of the bacteria in the meadow soils. Hsu and Buckley (2009) have found that higher levels of vegetation biomass reduce nitrogen-fixing bacterial diversity, and a higher vegetation biomass was observed in the shrubland soil than in the meadow soil (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the southern Qilian Mountains, the Shannon diversity index of the nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the shrubland soil was lower than that of the bacteria in the meadow soils. Hsu and Buckley (2009) have found that higher levels of vegetation biomass reduce nitrogen-fixing bacterial diversity, and a higher vegetation biomass was observed in the shrubland soil than in the meadow soil (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamelin et al (2002) indicated that certain plants mediate favourable niches for nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Plant-specific differences in the nitrogen-fixing bacterial community may be related to plant species, biomass, the chemical composition of litter and root exudates (Shaffer et al, 2000;BĂŒrgmann et al, 2005;Hsu and Buckley, 2009;Knelman et al, 2012). Soil physicochemical factors, such as pH and water content (Zhan and Sun, 2011), microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen (Hayden et al, 2010), total nitrogen and total potassium (Teng et al, 2009;Hayden et al, 2010), total phosphorus and reactive phosphorus (Reed et al, 2010;Zou et al, 2011;Romero et al, 2012), electrical conductivity (Hayden et al, 2010;Hamilton et al, 2011) and nutrient level (Jasrotia and Ogram, 2008;Zhan and Sun, 2012), have also been identified as drivers of nifH gene diversity and abundance in many environments.…”
Section: S Tai Et Al: High Diversity Of Nitrogen-fixing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, our data showed a reduction of 24.6% and 40.7% in the signal intensities of various genes involved in nitrification and denitrification, respectively. Changes in the community structure have been shown to have functional significance for processes mediated by a narrow spectrum of organisms, such as nitrogen fixation and nitrification (Hsu and Buckley, 2009). Shifts in the microbial community of these specialists' bacteria can have strong impact on ecosystem functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of microbial communities can in turn have important implications for the rates of soil processes. For example, variation in microbial community structure in soils has been observed to influence rates of denitrification, nitrification, and nitrogen fixation [15][16][17][18][19][20]. This suggests that long-term organic management will shift microbial community composition and diversity relative to conventionally managed soils and that these changes will have qualitative and quantitative impacts on soil processes [7,9,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%