ABSRACT Drops with different concentrations of 3':5'-cyclic AMP were deposited at various distances from small populations of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae, and the distances over which 50% of the amoebae drops reacted positively were determined. The linear regression analysis of a double logarithmic plot of distance against concentration gives a straight line with a slope of 1/4.25, which value suggests that the amoebae respond to a spatial gradient of cyclic AMP concentration. The threshold value for the signal is 3.6 X 10-9 M/mm, with a sensitivity of measurement of about 1%. These findings are discussed in relation to our present knowledge of cyclic AMP receptors. Triggered by starvation, single amoebae of the cellular slime molds aggregate and develop a differentiated multicellular organism (1). In the larger species of Dictyostelium cell aggregation is mediated by 3':5'-cyclic AMP (2); amoebae move towards the aggregation center periodically (3), probably due to a periodic release of cyclic AMP from the center. Cyclic AMP signals are recognized by a cell-membranebound cyclic AMP receptor (4, 5), only present in those species that use cyclic AMP as the chemotactic molecule (5).Some of the most interesting questions about how cyclic AMP signals can be translated into directed movement are: (1) What precisely is the macroscopic signal input? (2) How is the signal measured by an individual cell? and (3) How sensitive is the organism to this signal? In 1947 Bonner (6) proposed the hypothesis that the cells move towards an aggregate by measuring a spatial gradient of concentration over its total length. In the present work, evidence in favor of such a hypothesis is given by comparison of the mathematical parameters of a gradient formed by diffusion to the characteristics of the threshold amoeba response. Also a threshold value for this gradient has been obtained and the sensitivity of amoebae to cyclic AMP has been measured.
METHODS AND TECHNIQUESAmeebe of D. discoideum, NC-4, were grown in associatWon wb£ rkcha coli on a solid medium, harvested in the ptive stage, freed of bacteria, and adjusted to 5 X 10' cells per ml with a 1% saline solution (7). Small drop (0.1 p1) of ths cell suspension were placed on hydrophobic aSr, giving a final radius of 0.3 mm. The chemotactic acSthiy of cyclic AMP (concentration ranging from 10-7 to 104 M) was tested when the amoebae were close to aggregation (8). Cyclic AMP drops (0.1 ,.) were placed at different distances from the amoebae populations (40 per given distance). The distance-measured between the centers of both drops-at which 50% of the amoebae populations react positively for a given cyclic AMP concentration was taken as the threshold distance for chemotaxis. The chemotactic response was called positive when more than twice as many cells pressed against the margin closest to the attracting drop as against the opposite side. The chemotactic response was observed at different time intervals after the deposition of the cyclic AMP drop (from 15 to 30 min) to get the...