2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(03)00393-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the dominance of collision-induced intersystem crossing in collisions of 1CH2 with O2 and a determination of the H atom yields from 3CH2+O2, using time-resolved detection of H formation by vuvLIF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of such CIISC fractional channel yields include 0:10 þ0:10 À0:04 for 1 CH 2 + H 2 [5], 0.1 for 1 CH 2 + CH 4 [3,6], and 0.22 for 1 CH 2 + C 2 H 2 [7]. Parallel measurements for 1 CH 2 + O 2 , by contrast, have demonstrated unit efficiency for CIISC [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such CIISC fractional channel yields include 0:10 þ0:10 À0:04 for 1 CH 2 + H 2 [5], 0.1 for 1 CH 2 + CH 4 [3,6], and 0.22 for 1 CH 2 + C 2 H 2 [7]. Parallel measurements for 1 CH 2 + O 2 , by contrast, have demonstrated unit efficiency for CIISC [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reaction between 1 CH2 and O2, relaxation has been shown to be the only loss process on timescales applicable to this work (Blitz et al, 2003;Hancock and Haverd, 2003). This is reasonably assumed to be the case over the temperature range employed in this study, as evidenced by the fact that the removal rate of 1 CH2 with O2 over the temperature range of 43 -298 K (Douglas et al, 2018), remains over an order of magnitude faster than the H atom production rates observed in this study (Table II).…”
Section: Ch2 + O2 3 Ch2 + O2 (R18)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the reaction of 3 CH2 with O2 (R19), there have been four room temperature values reported by Blitz et al (2003), Darwin et al (1989), Alvarez and Moore (1994) , and Hancock and Haverd (2003). The reaction was studied by Blitz et al (2003) using a very similar procedure to that used in this work, while two of the other studies used laser flash photolysis of ketene at 351 nm to produce ground state 3 CH2, and monitored the reaction by detecting changes in the absorbance of either the 3 CH2 reactant (Darwin et al, 1989) or the CO product (Alvarez and Moore, 1994). Hancock and Haverd (2003) used time-resolved Fourier transform emission spectroscopy to monitor products from the reaction, with 3 CH2 also being produced by 351 nm photolysis of ketene.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations