1983
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830101)51:1<38::aid-cncr2820510110>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for separate modes of action in thermal radiosensitization and direct thermal cell death

Abstract: It is not known whether heat potentiation of radiation damage and direct heat death are mediated by the same or by different heat lesions within the cell. In this study, three types of experiments were performed on BP‐8 murine sarcoma cells to provide evidence against a common mode of action: (1)Evaluation of the kinetics of cell death from heat, radiation, and combined heat‐radiation treatments: direct heat death is rapid and essentially complete within 24‐48 hours after heat exposure, whereas radiation death… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many data, based on different heat treatments in one cell line, using altered pH, heat modifying agents or development of thermotolerance have suggested a causal relationship between heat killing and heat radiosensitization (Konings and van der Meer-Kalverkamp 1980, Freeman et al 1981, Djordjevic 1983, Haveman 1983, Raaphorst and Azzam 1983, Dewey 1983, Holahan et al 1984, van Rijn et al 1984 although other data do not show this relationship (Lunec and Parker 1980, Mivechi and Hofer 1983, Nielsen 1983, Hartson-Eaton et al 1984. The different results of these investigations may possibly be explained by the differences in cell lines used and in the different heat schedules employed.…”
Section: Heat Sensitivity Versus the Radiosensitizing Effect Of Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many data, based on different heat treatments in one cell line, using altered pH, heat modifying agents or development of thermotolerance have suggested a causal relationship between heat killing and heat radiosensitization (Konings and van der Meer-Kalverkamp 1980, Freeman et al 1981, Djordjevic 1983, Haveman 1983, Raaphorst and Azzam 1983, Dewey 1983, Holahan et al 1984, van Rijn et al 1984 although other data do not show this relationship (Lunec and Parker 1980, Mivechi and Hofer 1983, Nielsen 1983, Hartson-Eaton et al 1984. The different results of these investigations may possibly be explained by the differences in cell lines used and in the different heat schedules employed.…”
Section: Heat Sensitivity Versus the Radiosensitizing Effect Of Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lunec and Parker (1980) reported no effect of lowering pH on heat radiosensitization, while heat survival levels were markedly reduced. Furthermore, Mivechi and Hofer (1983) showed that 5 per cent glycerol did increase heat resistance but had no effect on heat radiosensitization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the authors' hands, a series of heatresistant cell lines that over-express hsp 27 (a gift of Dr J. Landry, University of Laval, Quebec) also did not display differences in heat-induced radiosensitization (Laszlo and Davidson, unpublished observations). Glycerol, a chemical heat protector, did not affect heat-induced radiosensitization [42]. The results obtained with transiently thermotolerant cells are equivocal: in some cases there is protection, while in others there is not, even in studies with the same cell line (reviewed in [17]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) is consistent with studies of hyperthermiainduced radiosensitization, ie., the temporal sequencing of hyperthermia and ionizing i r r a d i a t i~n .~.~.~~ Additionally, the data showing no appreciable difference in the fall of NAD levels for patients heated for 60 to 140 minutes are consistent with in vitro less than 42°C thermal radiosensitization studies of a lymphoid cell line (JM)2h and a sarcoma line (>42"C). 27 This research suggests a working hypothesis: WBH sensitizes cells to DNA-damaging agents by blocking the resynthesis of NAD consumed for ADP-ribose polymer synthesis and thereby limiting polymer synthesis and cellular recovery. Taken collectively, the results presented 2 102 CANCER April 15 199 1 Vol.…”
Section: Fraction Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%