2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9667-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Safe Tourniquet Use in 500 Consecutive Upper Extremity Procedures

Abstract: Background Although pneumatic tourniquets are widely used in upper extremity surgery, further evidence is needed to support their safe use. Excessive pressure and prolonged ischemic time can cause soft-tissue injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of tourniquet use in a yearlong, consecutive series of patients. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent upper extremity surgery by two board-certified hand surgeons over a 1-year period was performed. Demographic variables… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Thus, the use of a minimal effective tourniquet inflation pressure which provides a bloodless surgical field is desired. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 Although, clinical efforts and advances in tourniquet technology have resulted in the use of lower inflation pressures, there is still a lack of standard practice and consensus regarding minimal effective tourniquet inflation pressures. 16 , 17 , 18 Most of the orthopedic surgeons even routinely apply fixed tourniquet pressure of 250–300 mmHg or add fixed amount of pressure above SAP (SAP + 100–150 mm Hg) in lower extremity surgery based on individual experiences and accept these pressures as safe, in spite of reported adverse effects due to unnecessarily high tourniquet pressures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Thus, the use of a minimal effective tourniquet inflation pressure which provides a bloodless surgical field is desired. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 Although, clinical efforts and advances in tourniquet technology have resulted in the use of lower inflation pressures, there is still a lack of standard practice and consensus regarding minimal effective tourniquet inflation pressures. 16 , 17 , 18 Most of the orthopedic surgeons even routinely apply fixed tourniquet pressure of 250–300 mmHg or add fixed amount of pressure above SAP (SAP + 100–150 mm Hg) in lower extremity surgery based on individual experiences and accept these pressures as safe, in spite of reported adverse effects due to unnecessarily high tourniquet pressures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of tissue oxygenation can be further demonstrated by the fact that different organs have different tolerance for ischaemia and hypoxia. The muscle can tolerate one to two h of ischaemia without clinically overt injury, 12 while the brain can be permanently injured even if ischaemia only lasts for a few min. As a vital organ, the brain is prioritized during haemodynamic derangement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nerve injuries range from paresthesia to paralysis of the extremity . LOP measured by absent arterial pulses distal to the tourniquet using a Doppler is the recommended minimal pressure for tourniquets.…”
Section: Health History and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In upper‐extremity surgery, many surgeons choose tourniquet pressures 50 to 100 mm Hg above the systolic blood pressure and often use lower pressures for more distal tourniquets to avoid neurovascular injury, protecting the deeper vital structures when less subcutaneous tissue is present. The use of tourniquet pressures of 250 mm Hg or less for fewer than two hours of tourniquet time seems to be safe for adult patients, including older adult patients and patients with multiple medical comorbidities . Like upper‐extremity surgery, lower‐extremity surgery also relies on lower tourniquet pressures distally.…”
Section: Health History and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation