2019
DOI: 10.1101/623744
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for purifying selection on conserved noncoding elements in the genome ofDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Identification of regulatory regions within genomes is a key challenge for understanding the influence of functional traits on species evolution. Development of whole-genome sequencing programs in the early 2000s has been associated with the rise of comparative genomics as a powerful tool for predicting functional regions in genomes, using structural characteristics of DNA sequences. Conserved Noncoding Elements (CNEs, i.e. untranslated sequences highly similar across divergent species) were early identified a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the level of constraint on virus genes appeared low, with global π A /π S 0.39 and local π A /π S = 0.58. These patterns of diversity are markedly different to those of the host, in which π S (at four-fold degenerate sites) is on the order of 1 per cent with π A /π S (zero- and four-fold) around 0.2, and differentiation approximately F ST = 0.03 ( Kapun et al 2020 ; Tristan, Aurelie, and Annabelle 2019 ). Given that large dsDNA virus mutation rates can be ten- to 100-fold higher than animal mutation rates ( Duffy 2018 ), the overall lower diversity in Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus is consistent with bottlenecks during infection and the smaller population size that corresponds to a 2.1 per cent prevalence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In general, the level of constraint on virus genes appeared low, with global π A /π S 0.39 and local π A /π S = 0.58. These patterns of diversity are markedly different to those of the host, in which π S (at four-fold degenerate sites) is on the order of 1 per cent with π A /π S (zero- and four-fold) around 0.2, and differentiation approximately F ST = 0.03 ( Kapun et al 2020 ; Tristan, Aurelie, and Annabelle 2019 ). Given that large dsDNA virus mutation rates can be ten- to 100-fold higher than animal mutation rates ( Duffy 2018 ), the overall lower diversity in Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus is consistent with bottlenecks during infection and the smaller population size that corresponds to a 2.1 per cent prevalence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In general, the level of constraint on virus genes seemed low, with global πA/πS 0.39 and local πA/πS = 0.58. These patterns of diversity are markedly different to those of the host, in which πS (fourfold sites) is on the order of 1% with πA/πS (zero-fold and four-fold) around 0.2, and differentiation approximately FST = 0.03 (Tristan et al 2019, Kapun et al 2020. Given that large dsDNA virus mutation rates can be 10-100 fold higher than animal mutation rates (Duffy 2018), the overall lower diversity in Kallithea virus is consistent with bottlenecks during infection and the smaller population size that corresponds to a 2.1% prevalence.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Varies Among Viruses and Populationsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In general, the level of constraint on virus genes appeared low, with global TT A /TT S 0.39 and local TT A /TT S = 0.58. These patterns of diversity are markedly different to those of the host, in which πS (at fourfold degenerate sites) is on the order of 1% with TT A /TT S (zero-fold and four-fold) around 0.2, and differentiation approximately F ST = 0.03 (Tristan et al . 2019, Kapun et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%