1993
DOI: 10.2307/2389868
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Optimal Partitioning of Biomass and Nitrogen at a Range of Nitrogen Availabilities for a Fast- and Slow-Growing Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A main factor regulating the adaptation of plants to environmental constraints is plasticity in the pattern of resource allocation (Chapin et al, 1987 ;Tilman, 1990 ; Van der Werf et al, 1993). This plasticity has been given a functional interpretation : plants regulate allocation of resources in order to maximize the acquisition of the particular resource that limits growth (Gleeson & Tilman, 1992).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A main factor regulating the adaptation of plants to environmental constraints is plasticity in the pattern of resource allocation (Chapin et al, 1987 ;Tilman, 1990 ; Van der Werf et al, 1993). This plasticity has been given a functional interpretation : plants regulate allocation of resources in order to maximize the acquisition of the particular resource that limits growth (Gleeson & Tilman, 1992).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partitioning of nitrogen over leaf blades, leaf sheaths and roots (a,1, O~ns and anr) have been derived from the experiments ( Van der Werf et al, 1993b). Firstly, we will describe C~c~, act, O/' nl and o~,r as a function of the internal nitrogen concentration for plants grown under steady-state conditions.…”
Section: Brief Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the effect of nitrogen supply on partitioning of recently assimilated carbon and nitrogen and its relation to the internal nitrogen status of the plant under steady-state conditions. This relation is d e r i v e d f r o m a s l i g h t l y m o d i f i e d m o d e l presented by Van der Werf et al (1993b). The second topic is modelling allocation of carbon and nitrogen under n o n -s t e a d y -s t a t e nutrient c o n d i t i o n s .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition of fine sediments reduces oxygen concentrations (Thrush et al 2004), and carbon deposition increases hetrotrophic production which can compete for nutrients with primary producers (Gattuso et al 1998;Orwin et al 2006). Thus, while nutrient enrichment enhances plant growth by reducing the allocation to roots relative to aboveground tissues (Tilman 1988;van der Werf et al 1993;McKee 1996;Koch and Snedaker 1997), reductions in sediment oxygen concentrations and carbon-rich materials may decrease plant growth by increasing relative allocation to roots (McKee 1996;Weisner 1996;Eschen et al 2006). Nutrient enrichment and sedimentation could therefore have opposing effects on ecosystems: nutrient enrichment could stimulate autotrophic production, while the addition of fine sediments could reduce plant growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%