1988
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(88)91652-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for meson-exchange currents in the radiative thermal neutron capture by deuterium nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our prediction for the photon polarization parameter with the theoretical and the experimental results of Ref. [1,7,8] in this table. The magnetic M 1 -transition gives the dominant contribution for our calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare our prediction for the photon polarization parameter with the theoretical and the experimental results of Ref. [1,7,8] in this table. The magnetic M 1 -transition gives the dominant contribution for our calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The results for the thermal energy cross section and photon polarization parameter are presented in table I and II, along with the experimental data [1,13]. Table I compares Recently in a model dependent two-body current calculation, the total cross section for nd → 3 Hγ is obtained as σ T = 0.523 mb [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both these models are adjusted to reproduce experimental triton binding energy of BE( 3 H) = 8.482 MeV. 0.8574 332.6 ± 0.7 [38] 0.508 ± 0.015 [39] −0.420 ± 0.030 [40] The solution is drawn in solid line in the figure. The above curve fitting procedure turns out to be quite robust.…”
Section: B Magnetic Moments and Thermal Neutron Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of systematic effects for this experiment are generally very similar to those for p(n, γ )d. However, some of the possible systematic effects for this experiment are larger relative to the parity violating signal due to the need to use a thin target of D 2 . In addition, the circular polarization of the M1 gamma ray is much larger, around 42 % [ 9 ], than in p(n, γ )d, around 0.3 %, and this can also lead to larger systematic effects. Therefore, the measurement of parity violation in d(n, γ )t is actually more difficult than in p(n, γ )d despite the expected order-of-magnitude larger size of the effect.…”
Section: Neutron Depolarization In Deuteriummentioning
confidence: 99%