2018
DOI: 10.3390/insects9030108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Male Horn Dimorphism and Related Pronotal Shape Variation in Copris lunaris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Coprini)

Abstract: Male horn dimorphism is a rather common phenomenon in dung beetles, where some adult individuals have well-developed head horns (i.e., major males), while others exhibit diminished horn length (i.e., minor males). We focused on horn dimorphism and associated head and pronotum shape variations in Copris lunaris. We examined the allometric relationship between horn length (i.e., cephalic and pronotal horns) and maximum pronotum width (as index of body size) by fitting linear and sigmoidal models for both sexes. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual dimorphism is striking in this genus; all males bear a single, curved head horn and often also bear prothoracic horns, whereas females have only rudimentary horns. Some species exhibit male dimorphism in horn size (Eberhard and Gutiérrez 1991;Sugiura et al 2007;Pizzo et al 2015;Akamine 2016a;Kerman et al 2018). However, behaviours associated with this dimorphism and its adaptive aspects have received little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual dimorphism is striking in this genus; all males bear a single, curved head horn and often also bear prothoracic horns, whereas females have only rudimentary horns. Some species exhibit male dimorphism in horn size (Eberhard and Gutiérrez 1991;Sugiura et al 2007;Pizzo et al 2015;Akamine 2016a;Kerman et al 2018). However, behaviours associated with this dimorphism and its adaptive aspects have received little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used proW as a reliable approximation for body size (Knell 2009). We defined male morphs based on the switchpoint value reported in Kerman et al (2018): males with proW higher than the switchpoint value were considered majors while the opposite was true for minors (Akamine 2019). Horn lengths (cHL and pHL) were used to corroborate the assignment of males to each morph.…”
Section: Morphological Data Acquisition and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male dimorphism is relatively common in insect, and it is known (among others) also in some insect taxa which exihibit complex sound communication as the Orthoptera (Kelly 2005;Kelly and Adams 2010). However, several of the best-known example of male dimorphism are those found in Scarabaeidae genera such as Onthophagus (Emlen et al 2005;McCullough and Simmons 2016) and Copris (Sugiura et al 2007;Akamine 2016Akamine , 2019Kerman et al 2018), where some males have large bodies with long and sturdy horns (i.e. majors), while others possessing smaller body sizes with short, highly diminished horn structures (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The laminar, expanded armatures that originate from the clypeal portion of the head are the most conspicuous morphological character in the Eucraniini. Such heavy modifications leading to the development of exaggerated horns [12,13] are usually considered an expression of phenotypic plasticity, as already ascertained for many other Scarabaeinae [14,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%