1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91084-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Inapparent Rabies Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive rabies titers in the dogs of Florida may indicate past infection with survival, which is rare but has been reported in dogs. 16,18 Cross-reaction or a nonspecific reaction is also possible, although such reactions are seldom observed with titers Ͼ1:25, 13 which were seen in seven of the 17 dogs in Florida. None of the dogs showed signs consistent with rabies at the time of exam, but current infection and sampling during the incubation period of this viral disease cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive rabies titers in the dogs of Florida may indicate past infection with survival, which is rare but has been reported in dogs. 16,18 Cross-reaction or a nonspecific reaction is also possible, although such reactions are seldom observed with titers Ͼ1:25, 13 which were seen in seven of the 17 dogs in Florida. None of the dogs showed signs consistent with rabies at the time of exam, but current infection and sampling during the incubation period of this viral disease cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the examination of brains of clinical cases in Northern Nigeria did not implicate rabies-related viruses (30, t3), the presence of antibodies to rabies virus in non vaccinated dog serum samples is important in the epidemiology of rabies disease for two reasons. Firstly because it is now known that non fatal, latent abortive, or recovery from rabies infections can occur (5, 10,16,26), that the virus was continually isolated from saliva of dogs that developed subclinical infection in Brazil in experimental infection (9). The possibility of recovered dogs becoming carriers is very important from the public health point of view.…”
Section: It Is Not Possible To Differentiate Between the Lyssavirusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with virus isolated from naturally infected insectivorous bats, vampire bats, rodents, spotted skunks (Spilogaleputorius), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), and dogs have produced abortive, asymptomatic, or apathogenic infections or infections with long incubation periods. There also is substantial evidence for latent, asymptomatic, chronic, and abortive rabies in naturally infected animals (Webster 1937;Sulkin et al 1959;Bell 1966;Johnson 1966;Correa-Giron, Allen & Sulkin 1970;Constantine 1971;Lennette & Emmons 1971;Schneider & Schoop 1974;Doege & Northrop 1974;Bell 1975;Botros, Lewis & Kerkor 1970;Fekadu &-Baer 1980).…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%