1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1996)6:5<513::aid-hipo4>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for extrahippocampal involvement in place learning and hippocampal involvement in path integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

16
86
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
86
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that MK-801-treated rats can utilize visual cues, although their cue-mediated navigation abilities are impaired. Importantly, unlike rats with gross lesions of the hippocampus they did not return to the previous location of the platform after it had been moved to a new location (Morris et al 1982;Whishaw et al 1995;Whishaw and Jarrad 1996;Whishaw and Tomie 1997). In contrast, the 0.05 mg/kg group and the control group were slightly impaired in their acquisition performance on the first trials after the platform was moved to the new location indicating that these two groups used a spatial search strategy.…”
Section: Effects Of Mk-801 On Reversal Learningmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that MK-801-treated rats can utilize visual cues, although their cue-mediated navigation abilities are impaired. Importantly, unlike rats with gross lesions of the hippocampus they did not return to the previous location of the platform after it had been moved to a new location (Morris et al 1982;Whishaw et al 1995;Whishaw and Jarrad 1996;Whishaw and Tomie 1997). In contrast, the 0.05 mg/kg group and the control group were slightly impaired in their acquisition performance on the first trials after the platform was moved to the new location indicating that these two groups used a spatial search strategy.…”
Section: Effects Of Mk-801 On Reversal Learningmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This approach differs from the frequently used visible platform version in which the animal has to climb onto the platform protruding from the water Cain et al 1997;Saucier et al 1996;Whishaw et al 1995;Whishaw and Jarrad 1996;Whishaw and Tomie 1997). In the present study, retention was always tested The behavioral tests used in these studies discriminate unspecific drug effects from those on learning and memory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This was quickly taken as proof of O'Keefe and Nadel's cogniti6e map hypothesis [126]. But, since those initial studies, it has been shown that animals with a variety of hippocampal impairments could, in fact learn the hidden-platform water maze if they were given appropriate training [41,49,[232][233][234][235] The issue, of course, is that the water maze is not solved by a hippocampus in isolation, it is solved by a navigational system involving many structures beyond the hippocampus. These non-hippocampal structures may be able to solve the water maze under specific training paradigms.…”
Section: Multiple Na6igation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, as predicted by O'Keefe and Nadel [150], non-hippocampal navigation systems require immediate sensory cues off of which they can trigger the response (for example, hippocampal animals can beacon to a visible cue [49]). When immediate cues are not available, non-hippocampal navigation systems can learn to trigger off more complex cues if given sufficient training and if the complex cues are sufficiently different (for example, if they are first overtrained with a visible platform [234]). …”
Section: Multiple Na6igation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation