1991
DOI: 10.1063/1.40391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for evolution of the luminosity function of clusters of galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
263
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
263
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our Q ϭ 1 0 low-redshift temperature function has the same shape as in HA and the normalization, although still within the HA errors, is systematically a factor ∼2 lower. It is in good agreement with Edge et al (1990). This change results from the use here of a more robust estimator of the temperature function as well as the correction of a numerical error in HA.…”
Section: Observational Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, our Q ϭ 1 0 low-redshift temperature function has the same shape as in HA and the normalization, although still within the HA errors, is systematically a factor ∼2 lower. It is in good agreement with Edge et al (1990). This change results from the use here of a more robust estimator of the temperature function as well as the correction of a numerical error in HA.…”
Section: Observational Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…There have been many papers that have constrained cosmological parameters using X-ray temperature measurements of clusters (Henry & Arnaud 1991, hereafter HA;Lilje 1992;Oukbir & Blanchard 1992;Hanami 1993;White, Efstathiou, & Frenk 1993a;Bartlett & Silk 1993;Viana & Liddle 1996, hereafter VL;Eke, Cole, & Frenk 1996;Kitayama & Suto 1996, hereafter KS;Oukbir & Blanchard 1997, hereafter OB97). Nearly all of this work has used the low-redshift samples of HA and/or Edge et al (1990). The final result is that there is a degeneracy between j 8 and Q 0 ; the amplitude of the mass density fluctuations is tightly constrained for any given Q 0 , but neither is constrained separately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As these authors point out, there is considerable uncertainty in the number density of clusters above 6 keV at redshift zero. A consistent value of ∼ 30 × 10 −8 (h −1 Mpc) −3 is obtained from both the samples of Edge et al (1990) and HA91. Integrating the ROSAT Brightest Cluster Sample (BCS) (Ebeling et al 1997) best-fitting Schechter function for the EMSS passband (0.3−3.5 keV) from infinity to the luminosity corresponding to 6 keV (1.25 × 10 37 h −2 W) suggests a number density of clusters of ∼ 40×10 −8 (h −1 Mpc) −3 .…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…EMSS (Henry et al 1992;Gioia & Luppino 1994), ASCA (e.g. Donahue 1996;Mushotzky & Scharf 1997;Henry 1997) and ROSAT (Ebeling et al 1997, Burke et al 1997, Rosati et al 1998) measurements of the X-ray emitting intracluster plasma now complement the low-redshift studies carried out by Edge et al (1990) and David et al (1993). In addition, the CNOC survey provides galaxy velocity dispersions for a well-defined sample of high-redshift clusters (Carlberg et al 1996) and further information on mass distributions is coming from weak gravitational lensing measurements (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the X-ray flux limited sample by Edge et al (1990), we considered all the clusters with a temperature T ≥ 8 keV, a redshift z < 0.1, and declination δ > −40 • (to be observed by the VLA). Among the resulting nine clusters (Ophiuchus, Coma, A2319, A754, A2142, A401, A644, A2065, A2255) we skipped Coma and A2255 because they were already analyzed in other RM projects (Feretti et al 1995;Govoni et al 2006;Bonafede et al 2010), and A754 because of its complex X-ray morphology.…”
Section: Vla Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%