Evidence for Endogenous Opioid Modulation of Serum Luteinizing Hormone and Prolactin in the Steer

Abstract

Opioid modulation of LH and prolactin (PRL) concentrations in Angus steers was investigated. In Exp. 1, morphine sulfate (M) was administered at either 1, 2 or 3 mg/kg BW (n = 4) as an i.v. injection. Blood samples were obtained at 15-min intervals for 4 h pre- and post-treatment for serum hormone analyses. Mean serum LH concentration and number of LH secretory pulses decreased (P less than .1) for 2 h after M (4.1 to nadir of 2.4 ng/ml, and .33 vs. .21 pulses/h; pre- vs post-treatment). Luteinizing hormone pulse amplitude decreased (P less than .01; 7.3 vs 2.6 ng/ml; pre- vs post-treatment) during the 2 h following M. Prolactin concentrations increased 126.6%, 170.6% and 187.6% following 1, 2 and 3 mg M/kg BW, respectively (P less than .05, 1 vs 2; P less than .01, 1 vs 3). In Exp. 2, either saline solution (S, n = 6) or M (.31 mg/kg BW, i.v. injection followed by .15 mg/(kg.h) infusion; n = 6) was given for 7 h. Concentration of LH was unaffected. Response of LH to naloxone was determined in Exp. 3. Blood samples were obtained for 2 h pre- and post-administration of either naloxone (1 mg/kg BW, i.v. injection; n = 5) or S (n = 5). Response of LH at 15, 30 and 45 min posttreatment was greater (P less than .05) in naloxone- compared with S-treated steers. In summary, M had no significant effect on serum LH concentration or LH pulse frequency, but it decreased pulse amplitude and increased serum PRL concentrations. In contrast, naloxone increased LH secretion. These observations taken together indicate a physiological role for opioid modulation of LH and PRL secretion in the steer.

Effects of feeding diets containing endophyte-infected fescue seed on luteinizing hormone secretion in postpartum beef cows and in cyclic heifers and cows

“…Basal LH concentration was defined as the mean of all values except pulse concentrations during the initial 7 h of a serial bleed. A secretory pulse was defined as a concentration increase 2 50% above the previous nadir followed by at least two points on the downslope (Peck et al, 1988). Amplitude was calculated as the difference between pulse magnitude and basal concentration.…”