1996
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.1996.3581590215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for effects of CO2 on soil solution chemistry in spodosols by a simple in‐field extractor

Abstract: -ZusammenfassungDegassing of CO2 during collection of soil solution may alter the chemical composition of the solution, especially in well-buffered soils.We used a simple syringe extractor for field sampling of soil solution along with ambient soil air in order to test the influence of degassing ol'C0: on solution pH in acid soils (Spodosol B and C horizons collected in Central Maine, U S A ) . Soil air concentrations of C 0 2 varied from 0.36 to 1.35 ml I-' during sampling immediately after snow melt. Degassi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH values in field‐collected soil solutions obtained with the suction plates were greater than those measured in the laboratory extracts of the soil and biochar‐soil mixture (Figure , Table ). This may be explained by buffering of H 2 CO 3 in the field soil and subsequent de‐gassing of CO 2 when the soil solution is extracted with suction plates (Kaupenjohann & David, ) as described by: x‐M + H 2 CO 3 → x‐H + MOH + CO 2 ↑. As in the laboratory extracts, the pH of soil solutions of the 5% treatment was about one pH unit higher than without biochar addition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH values in field‐collected soil solutions obtained with the suction plates were greater than those measured in the laboratory extracts of the soil and biochar‐soil mixture (Figure , Table ). This may be explained by buffering of H 2 CO 3 in the field soil and subsequent de‐gassing of CO 2 when the soil solution is extracted with suction plates (Kaupenjohann & David, ) as described by: x‐M + H 2 CO 3 → x‐H + MOH + CO 2 ↑. As in the laboratory extracts, the pH of soil solutions of the 5% treatment was about one pH unit higher than without biochar addition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the CO 2 partial pressure of the soil air is commonly several times greater than in the atmosphere, CO 2 will be released from soil solution samples in contact with the atmosphere (Zabowski and Sletten, 1991). This increases the pH value of the sampled soil solution by about 0.3 to 0.5 pH units (Suarez, 1986, 1987; Kaupenjohann and David, 1996). The outgassing of CO 2 can be minimized in dual chamber sampling systems as proposed by Suarez (1986)…”
Section: Substance‐specific Requirements Of Solute Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, an error of as much as +0.3 pH units can occur simply by allowing loss of CO 2 from the sample by equilibration with the atmosphere." Kaupenjohann and David (1996) found that degassing carbon dioxide raised soil pH values by as much as +0.3 as well, but these experiments were conducted using contained bottles, which may not correspond to an experiment testing soils exposed to the larger atmospher or chamber with carbon dioxide. In another study by Dahlgren et al (1997), degassing carbon dioxide did not significantly affect soil pH, but a large decrease in ionic strength was observed, owing to the loss of of the HCO − 3 anion.…”
Section: Relation Of Non-standard Soil Ph Values To Standard Soil Phmentioning
confidence: 99%