2000
DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for DNA Loss as a Determinant of Genome Size

Abstract: Eukaryotic genome sizes range over five orders of magnitude. This variation cannot be explained by differences in organismic complexity (the C value paradox). To test the hypothesis that some variation in genome size can be attributed to differences in the patterns of insertion and deletion (indel) mutations among organisms, this study examines the indel spectrum in Laupala crickets, which have a genome size 11 times larger than that of Drosophila. Consistent with the hypothesis, DNA loss is more than 40 times… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
209
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
15
209
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1C), showing a normal distribution between the pulse rates of the 2 parental species (F 2 pulse rate mean Ϯ SD ϭ 1.86 Ϯ 0.36; Shapiro-Wilk: W ϭ 0.994, P ϭ 0.636) (23). (23), equal to the number predicted by cytological analysis (24). Most AFLP markers are dominant, but inclusion of several codominant AFLP markers allowed alignment of the Lp and Lk maps ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1C), showing a normal distribution between the pulse rates of the 2 parental species (F 2 pulse rate mean Ϯ SD ϭ 1.86 Ϯ 0.36; Shapiro-Wilk: W ϭ 0.994, P ϭ 0.636) (23). (23), equal to the number predicted by cytological analysis (24). Most AFLP markers are dominant, but inclusion of several codominant AFLP markers allowed alignment of the Lp and Lk maps ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, wheat breeders have been able to use mutants of the duplicated gibberellin insensitivity loci to design wheat with specific heights (Peng et al, 1999). Further studies contrasting the relative rates of insertion and deletion events should soon shed light on the reasons for the enormous variation in c-value among plant species, as recently argued for invertebrate genome evolution (Petrov et al 2000).…”
Section: Genome Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, 80% of NUPTs are eliminated from the rice nuclear genome within a million years (Matsuo et al, 2005). The rate of DNA loss differs between DNA fragment sizes and among species (Petrov et al, 2000) and can potentially contribute to the sizedependent filtering of NUPTs or NUMTs (Richly and Leister, 2004a,b). In this way, the nuclear genome absorbs, fragments, reshuffles and eliminates plastid and mitochondrial sequences with a species-specific mode and tempo.…”
Section: A Model Of Nupt/numt and Te Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%