2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.103.l081301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for different gravitational-wave sources in the NANOGrav dataset

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the induced GWs are not the only explanations of the NANOGrav results. For example, among many others, possible candidates are cosmic strings [328][329][330][331] and first order phase transitions [332][333][334][335][336][337][338][339]. Within the next decades, we expect to have more information from PTA experiments.…”
Section: Current and Future Observational Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the induced GWs are not the only explanations of the NANOGrav results. For example, among many others, possible candidates are cosmic strings [328][329][330][331] and first order phase transitions [332][333][334][335][336][337][338][339]. Within the next decades, we expect to have more information from PTA experiments.…”
Section: Current and Future Observational Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also expect the GW detector LISA to launch. In order to distinguish these candidates to the NANOGrav data, we will need better resolution for a better Bayesian analysis [336] but crucially we will need other discriminators of cosmic GWs. In the case of induced GWs, if some of the LIGO binary black hole mergers are found to be PBHs, the NANOGrav signal would have a strong case to be induced GWs.…”
Section: Current and Future Observational Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the other interpretations of the NANOGrav data, e.g., primordial black holes, dark phase transition and inflation please see refs. [95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.11). 13 We have so far considered the case N = 1 corresponding to the usually considered total number of RH neutrinos N = 3. However, we can also study how the GW signal changes with increasing N .…”
Section: Jhep10(2021)193mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that a low scale dark phase transition may address the NANOGrav result has been recently considered in ref. [12] (see also [13] for a Bayesian analysis comparing it with other explanations) and, more specifically, within a Majoron model with nonrenormalizable effective operators in ref. [14].…”
Section: Jhep10(2021)193 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%