Evidence for continuing professional development standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review

Abstract

Background Health practitioner regulators throughout the world use continuing professional development (CPD) standards to ensure that registrants maintain, improve and broaden their knowledge, expertise and competence. As the CPD standard for most regulated health professions in Australia are currently under review, it is timely that an appraisal of the evidence be undertaken. Methods A systematic review was conducted using major databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL), search engines and grey literature for evidence published between 2015 and April 2022. Publications included in the review were assessed against the relevant CASP checklist for quantitative studies and the McMaster University checklist for qualitative studies. Results The search yielded 87 abstracts of which 37 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. The evidence showed that mandatory CPD requirements are a strong motivational factor for their completion and improves practitioners’ knowledge and behaviour. CPD that is more interactive is most effective and e-learning is as effective as face-to-face CPD. There is no direct evidence to suggest the optimal quantity of CPD, although there was some evidence that complex or infrequently used skills deteriorate between 4 months to a year after training, depending on the task. Conclusions CPD is most effective when it is interactive, uses a variety of methods and is delivered in a sequence involving multiple exposures over a period of time that is focused on outcomes considered important by practitioners. Although there is no optimal quantity of CPD, there is evidence that complex skills may require more frequent CPD.

An Insight into Knowledge, Perspective, and Practices of Indian Optometrists towards Childhood Myopia

“…Despite abundant research evidence on myopia management, a lack of confidence to appraise a research article (insufficient time for professional development) and inadequate time for research in clinical practice (insufficient support from the workplace) are the other potential barriers to not being updated with the best clinical practice. Lifelong learning and continuing professional development (CPD) are linked to enhancing knowledge, skills, and performance to deliver optimum healthcare [ 50 , 51 ]. However, very little is known about the allocated or protected time to attend training for practicing optometrists.…”

Translating research into a relevant education activity to fulfil pharmacists' continuing professional development requirements

“…As CPD relates to ongoing personal development, and should be relevant to an individual's current educational level, identified need, and their area of practice, 2 the type of activities undertaken can vary significantly between pharmacists. It is therefore significant that most participants stated this education activity met their CPD requirements.…”

“…Continuing professional development (CPD) has been defined as ‘the systematic maintenance, improvement and continuous acquisition and/or reinforcement of the lifelong knowledge, skills and competences’. 1 For many health professionals internationally, CPD is a mandated requirement for annual recertification 2 , 3 , 4 and this includes pharmacists in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). 5 Pharmacists in NZ are required to declare that they have undertaken a variety of CPD activities relevant to Pharmacist Competency Standards each year, and to provide evidence of this ( Table 1 .)…”

Willingness to Learn, Yet No Lessons Available? Environmental Sustainability Training and Policy in Australia and New Zealand

“…These results suggest it is timely to capitalize on ES interest, addressing dissenting beliefs through clear linkage to policy-makers' ES objectives and the perceived practical benefits research suggests are worthwhile [9]. As Maine and Anderson [56] identified in their international systematic review of health practitioners, CPD training with outcomes communicated important by targeted professionals are more effective than those that practitioners may consider unimportant [56]. This underscores the importance governmentality and governance systemically play to influencing individual behavior and value expression.…”