2004
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.78.21.11707-11714.2004
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for both Lytic Replication and Tightly Regulated Human Herpesvirus 8 Latency in Circulating Mononuclear Cells, with Virus Loads Frequently below Common Thresholds of Detection

Abstract: To address whether human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) might be the product of latent or lytic infection and to shed light on sporadic detection of HHV-8 DNA in individuals seropositive for the virus, we studied the frequency of infected cells, total virus load, and virus load per infected cell in PBMCs from men coinfected with HHV-8 and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), some of whom had Kaposi's sarcoma. The low frequencies of infected cells detected (fewer than one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 positive PCR from a KSHV-seronegative sample was derived from a woman with HIV coinfection and detectable ORF73-and ORF65-specific responses. Thus, although the PCR amplification appeared to be even less sensitive than serologic testing, we were able to identify 1 individual who had negative KSHV serologic results but was PCR positive and who showed detectable KSHV-specific T cell activity (table 2) [31]. Thus, the combined ELISPOT and PCR data, as well as epidemiological considerations, strongly suggest that the subjects with positive ELISPOT responses were indeed KSHV infected but did not show a detectable serologic response at the time when mounting detectable T cell responses.…”
Section: Kshv Serologic Results In Subjects With Ks and Those With Anmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The 1 positive PCR from a KSHV-seronegative sample was derived from a woman with HIV coinfection and detectable ORF73-and ORF65-specific responses. Thus, although the PCR amplification appeared to be even less sensitive than serologic testing, we were able to identify 1 individual who had negative KSHV serologic results but was PCR positive and who showed detectable KSHV-specific T cell activity (table 2) [31]. Thus, the combined ELISPOT and PCR data, as well as epidemiological considerations, strongly suggest that the subjects with positive ELISPOT responses were indeed KSHV infected but did not show a detectable serologic response at the time when mounting detectable T cell responses.…”
Section: Kshv Serologic Results In Subjects With Ks and Those With Anmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The lower copy number of HHV-8 detected in PBMC in comparison to KS tissue, could be due to its latent state within this compartment, in contrast to viral expression present in lesional spindle cells [17]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive reactions were confirmed with a second PCR amplification using the HHV-8 orf 37 primers and probes [12]. HIV viral loads were measured with reverse transcription-PCR Taqman as described [13].…”
Section: Human Herpesvirus 8 and Hiv Viral Load Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%