2011
DOI: 10.22498/pages.19.2.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for bias in C/N, δ13C and δ15N values of aquatic and terrestrial organic materials due to acid pre-treatment methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acidification of samples was necessary to analyze the organic material without inclusion of thermal decomposition of carbonate-carbon. It has been demonstrated that rinsing sediments and soils containing organic material after acid treatment can mobilize some of the organic matter, 59 however the resulting ambiguity of pyrolyzing samples containing carbonate minerals was considered a higher cost to our experimental approach. Thus, samples from Bay Jimmy were also acid treated after inspection for and removal of shell fragments, to ensure that all samples were treated equally for this experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acidification of samples was necessary to analyze the organic material without inclusion of thermal decomposition of carbonate-carbon. It has been demonstrated that rinsing sediments and soils containing organic material after acid treatment can mobilize some of the organic matter, 59 however the resulting ambiguity of pyrolyzing samples containing carbonate minerals was considered a higher cost to our experimental approach. Thus, samples from Bay Jimmy were also acid treated after inspection for and removal of shell fragments, to ensure that all samples were treated equally for this experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%