2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for avoiding the biopsy of typical fibroadenomas in women aged 25–29 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical diagnosis of fibroadenoma is mainly based on palpation and imaging examinations, namely ultrasonography, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The reported that the accuracy of breast ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fibroadenoma is 78.8% to 99.5% [4–9] . The specificity of mammography for diagnosing of fibroadenoma is 83.9%, which is lower than that for ultrasonography (88.2%), [23] but mammography has outstanding advantages for differentiating malignant from benign calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical diagnosis of fibroadenoma is mainly based on palpation and imaging examinations, namely ultrasonography, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The reported that the accuracy of breast ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fibroadenoma is 78.8% to 99.5% [4–9] . The specificity of mammography for diagnosing of fibroadenoma is 83.9%, which is lower than that for ultrasonography (88.2%), [23] but mammography has outstanding advantages for differentiating malignant from benign calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is safe not to biopsy of typical fibroadenomas in young women when the clinical and sonographic presentations meet strict criteria. This is because, in these patients, ultrasonography and pathology have good concordance rates, and a missed diagnosis of malignant disease is rare [8,9,18] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In K2, U2 (BI-RADS 2–3) cases, patient at normal risk (no multiple positive family history or confirmed gene mutation), with a sharp-edged, ovoid lesion not larger than 3 cm, having homogeneous structure and a longitudinal axis parallel to the skin surface, containing less than four (macro) lobulations, and displaying no hyperechoic halo sign ( 81 84 ). • Physical examination • Ultrasound scanning under the age of 30–35 years, complemented by mammography, if needed (suspected malignancy).…”
Section: Assessment Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, age has been proposed to guide investigations in the work-up of breast lumps ( Table 2 ). 10 , 13 , 14…”
Section: Age-based Approach To a Palpable Breast Lumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibroadenomas are still common in patients between 25 and 30 years of age, but more breast cancers are diagnosed with increasing age. 13 The safest approach would be to remove all palpable breast lumps in patients over 30 years. All lesions that are not excised need to be followed up by regular 6-monthly clinical examination and ultrasound to document stability for a minimum of two years.…”
Section: Age-based Approach To a Palpable Breast Lumpmentioning
confidence: 99%