1996
DOI: 10.1006/bijl.1996.0064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for association of chromosomal form and development time from complex clines and geographic races in the grasshopperCaledia captiva(Orthoptera: Acridadae)

Abstract: Evidence for an association between chromosomal form and development time in the grasshopper Caledia captiva (F.) was obtained through comparison of two geographic taxa and analysis of a complex latitudinal cline within one of the taxa. Northern populations of the Moreton taxon possess a metacentric genome and are slow-developing. In contrast, the Torresian taxon, distributed throughout northern, coastal Australia, a region of pronounced seasonality in rainfall, and southern populations of the Moreton taxon, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, chromosome hybrid zones in other orthopteran species are not thought to have their widths determined by reduction in fitness of hybrids resulting from chromosome rearrangements (Shaw 1981;Harrison and Rand 1989;Butlin 1998). For example, the width of the hybrid zone between the Moreton and Torresian races of Caledia captiva on the eastern coast of Australia does not appear to be determined by the chromosome rearrangements even though evidence for karyotype selection has been found (Groeters and Shaw 1996). Although hybrid zone width may not be determined by the chromosome rearrangements in a number of studies, the chromosome clines themselves do seem to be influenced by chromosome heterozygote disadvantage.…”
Section: Variation In Chromosome Cline Widths Among Five Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, chromosome hybrid zones in other orthopteran species are not thought to have their widths determined by reduction in fitness of hybrids resulting from chromosome rearrangements (Shaw 1981;Harrison and Rand 1989;Butlin 1998). For example, the width of the hybrid zone between the Moreton and Torresian races of Caledia captiva on the eastern coast of Australia does not appear to be determined by the chromosome rearrangements even though evidence for karyotype selection has been found (Groeters and Shaw 1996). Although hybrid zone width may not be determined by the chromosome rearrangements in a number of studies, the chromosome clines themselves do seem to be influenced by chromosome heterozygote disadvantage.…”
Section: Variation In Chromosome Cline Widths Among Five Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some species of insects a ‘saw‐tooth’ pattern has been described. The ‘saw‐tooth’ pattern occur where a species shift the life cycle from bivoltine (two generations per year) to univoltine (one generation per year) (Masaki, ; Mousseau & Roff, ; Brennan & Fairbairn, ; Groeters & Shaw, ; Mousseau, ; Johansson, ; Nygren et al ., ). According to this pattern, body size of insect tends to increase at lower latitudes in univoltine and bivoltine areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Taupo (Zone 5), an earlier study of unlinked nuclear markers revealed that this hybrid zone was reducing the introgression of the chromosomal markers more than genic markers (allozyme and microsatellite) and therefore cline width might be controlled by the reduction in fitness of hybrids resulting from the actual chromosome rearrangement have their widths determined by reduction in fitness of hybrids resulting from chromosome rearrangements (Shaw 1981;Harrison and Rand 1989;Butlin 1998). For example, the width of the hybrid zone between the Moreton and Torresian races of Caledia captiva on the eastern coast of Australia does not appear to be determined by the chromosome rearrangements even though evidence for karyotype selection has been found (Groeters and Shaw 1996). Although hybrid zone width may not be determined by the chromosome rearrangements in a number of studies, the chromosome clines themselves do seem to be influenced by chromosome heterozygote disadvantage.…”
Section: Variation In Chromosome Cline Widths Among Five Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%