2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Accretion Rate Change During Type I X-Ray Bursts

Abstract: The standard approach for time-resolved X-ray spectral analysis of thermonuclear bursts involves subtraction of the pre-burst emission as background. This approach implicitly assumes that the persistent flux remains constant throughout the burst. We reanalyzed 332 photospheric radius expansion bursts observed from 40 sources by the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, introducing a multiplicative factor f a to the persistent emission contribution in our spectral fits. We found that for the majority of spectra the best… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
200
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(68 reference statements)
21
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both models provide good and stable fits. Like Worpel et al (2013), we found that f a increases during the peak phase (up to 20 or so, with typical values around 5), and remains significantly above 1 over the 20-s interval following the burst. An example of f a variations for three bursts is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Burst Parameterssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Both models provide good and stable fits. Like Worpel et al (2013), we found that f a increases during the peak phase (up to 20 or so, with typical values around 5), and remains significantly above 1 over the 20-s interval following the burst. An example of f a variations for three bursts is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Burst Parameterssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This works well in practice, because the burst emission is much stronger than the persistent emission, at least around the burst peak (see also the discussion in Kuulkers et al 2002). Recently, however, observations have shown that the persistent component does evolve during the burst (in 't Zand et al 2013;Worpel et al 2013;Ji et al 2014;Keek et al 2014a). Furthermore, as the reflection spectrum resembles that of the neutron star's flux (Ballantyne 2004), they are typically not distinguished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, recently indications have been found that anisotropies may even evolve during a single X-ray burst. Worpel et al (2013) found that the observed persistent flux briefly increases during bursts, which they measure as a multiplicative factor, f a (see also in 't Zand et al 2013;Worpel et al 2015). The anisotropy parameter p 1 x -has a similar effect on the observed flux to f a .…”
Section: Variability In Persistent and Burst Fluxmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Worpel et al (2013) suggest that the persistent emission may increase during bursts, the statistics of the JEM-X spectra are not sensitive enough to include this effect. Our net-burst spectra are described well by a black-body component modified by the interstellar absorption, which is dominated by photoelectric absorption.…”
Section: Burst Spectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%