2017
DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2017)025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture

Abstract: The Weak Gravity Conjecture postulates the existence of superextremal charged particles, i.e. those with mass smaller than or equal to their charge in Planck units. We present further evidence for our recent observation that in known examples a much stronger statement is true: an infinite tower of superextremal particles of different charges exists. We show that effective Kaluza-Klein field theories and perturbative string vacua respect the Sublattice Weak Gravity Conjecture, namely that a finite index sublatt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
319
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
11
319
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As before, the leading contribution to the kinetic term of the saxion is 24) and the canonically normalised saxion is given by (5.22). The leading contribution to the kinetic term for the axion is 25) where omitted terms decrease as (u+ū) −3 . While both K uū and K vv scale as (u+ū) −2 , this behaviour has different origins in the two cases.…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)097mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As before, the leading contribution to the kinetic term of the saxion is 24) and the canonically normalised saxion is given by (5.22). The leading contribution to the kinetic term for the axion is 25) where omitted terms decrease as (u+ū) −3 . While both K uū and K vv scale as (u+ū) −2 , this behaviour has different origins in the two cases.…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)097mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more careful definition becomes important when several U(1) group factors (or axion species) are present. See [5,9,11,13,17,25] for more details. [113].…”
Section: Gravitational Instantons and The Weak Gravity Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maybe this is not the case, which begs the question; or maybe, whenever we have a sector like the one discussed above, the full theory behaves in such a way that after Higgsing the new EFT cutoff is indeed (g/Z)M P . In the latter point of view, advocated in [30], variants of the WGC are valid constraints on EFT's which are not in the Swampland, and the objections raised in [27] and which we have just reviewed do not apply.…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)057mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…If there are no fields in the EFT other than ψ 1 , ψ 2 and the gauge fields, there is no new physics scale at ≃ (g/Z)M p , and the magnetic WGC fails under Higgsing in this particular model. As discussed in [30], the above reasoning makes the implicit assumption that the UV theory before Higgsing (with fields ψ 1 , ψ 2 , A 1 , A 2 , and nothing else) is not in the Swampland to begin with. Maybe this is not the case, which begs the question; or maybe, whenever we have a sector like the one discussed above, the full theory behaves in such a way that after Higgsing the new EFT cutoff is indeed (g/Z)M P .…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)057mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation