Evidence for a Solid-Electrolyte Inductive Effect in Superionic Conductors

Abstract

<p>Identifying and optimizing highly-conducting lithium-ion solid electrolytes is a critical step towards the realization of commercial all–solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Strategies to enhance ionic conductivities in solid electrolytes typically focus on the effects of modifying their crystal structures or of tuning mobile-ion stoichiometries. A less-explored approach is to modulate the chemical-bonding interactions within a material to promote fast lithium-ion diffusion. Recently, the idea of a solid-electrolyte inductive effect was proposed, whereby changes in bonding within the solid-electrolyte host-framework modify the potential-energy landscape for the mobile ions, resulting in an enhanced ionic conductivity. This concept has since been invoked to explain anomalous conductivity trends in a number of solid electrolytes. Direct evidence for a solid-electrolyte inductive effect, however, is lacking—in part because of the challenge of quantifying changes in local bonding interactions within a solid-electrolyte host-framework. <a></a><a>Here, we consider the evidence for a solid-electrolyte inductive effect in the archetypal superionic lithium-ion conductor Li<sub>10</sub>Ge<sub>1−<i>x</i></sub>Sn<i><sub>x</sub></i>P<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub>, using Rietveld refinements against high-resolution temperature-dependent neutron-diffraction data, Raman spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations.</a> Substituting Ge for Sn weakens the {Ge,Sn}–S bonding interactions and increases the charge-density associated with the S<sup>2-</sup> ions. This charge redistribution modifies the Li<sup>+</sup> substructure causing Li<sup>+</sup> ions to bind more strongly to the host-framework S anions; which in turn modulates the Li-ion potential-energy surface, increasing local barriers for Li-ion diffusion. Each of these effects is consistent with the predictions of the solid-electrolyte inductive effect model. Density functional theory calculations further predict that this inductive effect occurs even in the absence of changes to the host-framework geometry due to Ge → Sn substitution. These results provide direct evidence in support of a measurable solid-electrolyte inductive effect and demonstrate its application as a practical strategy for tuning ionic conductivities in superionic lithium-ion conductors.</p>

Insights into the rich polymorphism of the Na+ ion conductor Na3PS4 from the perspective of variable-temperature diffraction and spectroscopy

“…In other words, the electronic density around the sulfur atoms shifts from coordinating the Na + ions to the P-S covalent bonds. This can be seen as an instance of the "inductive effect" as applied recently to solid electrolytes 58,59 , brought about in this case by temperature-driven phase transformation rather than chemical substitution. In addition, the pair distribution function of γ-Na3PS4 indicates no strong interatomic correlations beyond the first neighbor P-S, Na-S and S-S pairs, reminiscent of amorphous or liquid systems.…”