2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58250-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Relationship Between Algorithmic Scheme and Shape of Inferred Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees from processes known to produce different shapes are well separated in the metric that arises naturally from the scheme. This suggests applications in inferring evolutionary processes and to detecting tree shape bias ( Huelsenbeck and Kirkpatrick 1996 ; Gascuel 2000 ; Stam 2002 ). The structure and simplicity of this comparison tool carry a number of advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trees from processes known to produce different shapes are well separated in the metric that arises naturally from the scheme. This suggests applications in inferring evolutionary processes and to detecting tree shape bias ( Huelsenbeck and Kirkpatrick 1996 ; Gascuel 2000 ; Stam 2002 ). The structure and simplicity of this comparison tool carry a number of advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree shapes carry information about the underlying evolutionary processes, and distributions of tree shapes under simple null models can be used to test hypotheses about evolution ( Mooers and Heard 1997 ; Blum and François 2006 ; Blum et al 2006 ; Purvis et al 2011 ; Wu and Choi 2015 ). Recent work also relates fitness, selection and a variety of ecological processes to tree shape ( Gascuel 2000 ; Hein et al 2004 ; Maia et al 2004 ; Wakeley and Wakeley 2009 ; Dayarian and Shraiman 2014 ; Manceau et al 2015 ). An additional motivation for studying the shapes of phylogenetic trees is that reconstructing branch lengths is challenging, particularly deep in a tree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees from processes known to produce different shapes are well separated in the metric that arises naturally from the scheme. This suggests applications in inferring evolutionary processes and to detecting tree shape bias (Huelsenbeck & Kirkpatrick, 1996;Gascuel, 2000;Stam, 2002). The structure and simplicity of this comparison tool carry a number of advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree shapes carry information about the underlying evolutionary processes, and distributions of tree shapes under simple null models can be used to test hypotheses about evolution (Mooers & Heard, 1997;Blum, François, & Janson, 2006;Purvis et al, 2011;Wu & Choi, 2015). Recent work also relates fitness, selection and a variety of ecological processes to tree shape (LP, Colato, & Fontanari, 2004;Dayarian & Shraiman, 2014;J Hein, 2004;Wakeley & Wakeley, 2009;Gascuel, 2000;Manceau et al, 2015). An additional motivation for studying the shapes of phylogenetic trees is that reconstructing branch lengths is challenging, particularly deep in a tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%