1980
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90153-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a primary cortical origin of a middle latency auditory evoked potential in cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using MLAEP to judge improvement in the wakeful level is useful, since the appearance of each component depends upon the normal function of the brain stem (Kaga et al 1980). The auditory cortex of the superior temporal gyrus was suggested as the generator source of Pa, based on many clinical reports of missing or abnormal Pa components in subjects with temporal lobe lesions (Graham et al 1980;Kraus et al 1982;Ozdamar et al 1982;Rosati et al 1982;Ozdamar and Kraus 1983), and on topographical mapping (Lee et al 1984) and parametric studies (Erwin and Buchwald 1986a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using MLAEP to judge improvement in the wakeful level is useful, since the appearance of each component depends upon the normal function of the brain stem (Kaga et al 1980). The auditory cortex of the superior temporal gyrus was suggested as the generator source of Pa, based on many clinical reports of missing or abnormal Pa components in subjects with temporal lobe lesions (Graham et al 1980;Kraus et al 1982;Ozdamar et al 1982;Rosati et al 1982;Ozdamar and Kraus 1983), and on topographical mapping (Lee et al 1984) and parametric studies (Erwin and Buchwald 1986a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N 0 and P 0 are likely exclusively the result of subcortical sources. The scalp potential field configuration observed for N a [Deiber et al, 1988] suggested a deep generator, possibly located at the midbrain or thalamus level, which would not produce a magnetic compo- Picton et al [1974Picton et al [ , 2000 Ponton et al [2000] (human, Vx latency) Di [1990, 1991] Miyazato et al [1995, 1999] Simpson and Knight [1993a (rat, Vx, ACx) Kraus et al [1985Kraus et al [ , 1988 (guinea pig, Vx, ACx) Kaga et al [1980] Buchwald et al [ ] Reese et al [1995a (cat, Vx, ACx) Steinschneider et al [1995] (monkey, depth CSD) Liégeois et al [1991Liégeois et al [ , 1994Liégeois et al [ , 1999 (human, epidural) Howard et al [1996Howard et al [ , 2000 nent due to a radial orientation. According to Deiber et al, the potential field for P a is different from that for N a , suggesting that distinct generators are responsible for these two components.…”
Section: Middle Latency Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evidence for a cortical origin of MLRs (especially wave Pa) involving primary auditory and/or association cortex stems largely from intracranial recordings in humans (7,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) and studies in patients with temporal lobe lesions (30)(31)(32). Studies in the cat implicate the auditory cortex as a generator site for the analogue of wave Pa (33). Although the issue of the generator(s) of middle latency components remains unresolved (e.g., see 12), most evidence favors primary and association auditory cortex involvement, particularly for wave Pa. Given the sensitivity of cortex, particularly frontal cortex, to anoxia and the fact that many of the daytime symptoms of apneics could be reflective of cortical impairment and are similar to the effects of acute impairment of cerebral oxygenation, one might predict that middle and/or long latency evoked responses would be affected either acutely during oxygen deprivation or chronically as a result of repeated insults by the high frequency of apneas and extremes of oxygen desaturation observed in cases of severe apnea, such as in our subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%